Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al

Filing 89

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 88 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MobileMedia Ideas LLC

CASE No C 4:17-cv-01958-HSG

Plaintiff(s)
v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■

Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties have agreed to use Antonio Piazza
as a mediator.

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
■

other requested deadline: on October 25 or 26, 2017

Date: June 29, 2017
Date: June 29, 2017

/s/ Alison Aubry Richards (for Ironworks only)
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Elizabeth L. Brann
Attorney for Defendant

X IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:

Date: 6/30/201
U
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDG
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IS
S
UDGE
UD
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017