Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al

Filing 89

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 88 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MobileMedia Ideas LLC CASE No C 4:17-cv-01958-HSG Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties have agreed to use Antonio Piazza as a mediator. Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: on October 25 or 26, 2017 Date: June 29, 2017 Date: June 29, 2017 /s/ Alison Aubry Richards (for Ironworks only) Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Elizabeth L. Brann Attorney for Defendant X IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 6/30/201 U U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDG U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE IS S UDGE UD Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?