Stephen Fantl et al v. David Glenwinkel et al

Filing 5

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 4 Ex Parte Application for Interim Judgment and Pre-final Judgment Writ of Attachment. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEPHEN FANTL, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 DAVID GLENWINKEL, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 4:17-cv-02033-KAW ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR INTERIM JUDGMENT AND PRE-FINAL JUDGMENT WRIT OF ATTACHMENT Re: Dkt. No. 4 12 On May 5, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte application for an order entering a pre-final 13 14 judgment writ of attachment against Defendants in the amount of $2,750,000.00. (Dkt. No. 4.) 15 Plaintiffs, however, did not include a memorandum of points and authorities, despite citing to 16 same in the ex parte application,1 nor did they provide any legal basis upon which the ex parte 17 relief may be granted. See Civil L.R. 7-10 (“The motion must include a citation to the statute, rule 18 or order which permits the use of an ex parte motion to obtain the relief sought.”) Accordingly, 19 Plaintiff’s ex parte application is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: June 22, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 There was no memorandum of points and authorities attached to the application or the other documents filed therewith.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?