Stephen Fantl et al v. David Glenwinkel et al

Filing 5

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 4 Ex Parte Application for Interim Judgment and Pre-final Judgment Writ of Attachment. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

STEPHEN FANTL, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

8
v.

9
10

DAVID GLENWINKEL, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 4:17-cv-02033-KAW
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM
JUDGMENT AND PRE-FINAL
JUDGMENT WRIT OF ATTACHMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 4

12
On May 5, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte application for an order entering a pre-final

13
14

judgment writ of attachment against Defendants in the amount of $2,750,000.00. (Dkt. No. 4.)

15

Plaintiffs, however, did not include a memorandum of points and authorities, despite citing to

16

same in the ex parte application,1 nor did they provide any legal basis upon which the ex parte

17

relief may be granted. See Civil L.R. 7-10 (“The motion must include a citation to the statute, rule

18

or order which permits the use of an ex parte motion to obtain the relief sought.”) Accordingly,

19

Plaintiff’s ex parte application is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated: June 22, 2017
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

There was no memorandum of points and authorities attached to the application or the other
documents filed therewith.