Andrew C. et al v. Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan et al
Filing
36
SCHEDULING AND SEALING ORDER re 35 Status Report filed by Andrew C., Robert C., United Healthcare Insurance Company, Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan. Plaintiff to file affirmative Motion for Judgment by 10/30/2018. Defendan t to file a Single/Joint Motion opposing Plaintiff's Motion with its own Cross-Motion for Judgment by 11/13/2018. Plaintiff to file a Reply a Single/Joint Reply in Support of his/her Motion with an Opposition to the Cross-Motion by 11/27/2018. Defendant to file a Reply in Support of the Cross-Motion Only by 12/4/2018. Motion Hearing set for Tuesday 12/18/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/11/18.* The Friday, 10/12/18 Compliance hearing is VACATED. *(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ANDREW C., ET AL.,
7
Plaintiffs,
9
10
SCHEDULING AND SEALING ORDER
vs.
8
CASE NO. 17-cv-02072-YGR
ORACLE AMERICA INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFIT
PLAN, ET AL.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The Court has read and reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report. (Dkt. No. 35). The
13
Court reserves on the issue regarding the breach of fiduciary duty claim. Any request for
14
discovery must be made by motion. Given that this case arises under the Employee Retirement
15
Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., the Court will not set a date
16
17
18
for a bench trial until briefing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 is completed. 1 If
required, a bench trial can be scheduled on a fairly expedited basis. A case management
conference can be scheduled if required by contacting the Court’s courtroom deputy. See Standing
Order in Civil Cases ¶ 12.
19
Defendant shall preserve the administrative record. The parties shall meet and confer on
20
21
22
23
the scope of the administrative record and agree upon deadlines for resolution of this issue. The
administrative record shall be delivered to the Court seven (7) days prior to the filing of the first
brief referenced below and in the manner set forth herein:
First, the parties shall file a Notice of Manual Filing on the docket;
24
Second, a physical copy of the administrative record (Bate-stamped and double-sided
25
pages) shall be delivered in three-ringed binders. The administrative record shall include
26
27
28
1
Should the parties determine that a bench trial will be required, rather than (or in
conjunction with) resolution on the papers, the Court will discuss the issue with the parties at the
next case management conference and modify the schedule if necessary.
1
an index and be segregated in appropriate categories, such as medical records, third party
2
expert reports, etc.
3
Third, an electronic copy of the administrative record shall be filed under seal pursuant to
4
this Order. Given the anticipated size of the record, it will likely be filed in “parts” which
shall be indexed to allow for easy access to the documents. The index shall be separately
5
filed. In addition, the parties shall deliver the electronic form of the administrative record
6
in CDs or thumb-drive(s) along with the physical copy. The electronic copy shall allow
7
for electronic searching.
8
9
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
LAST DAY TO AMEND PLEADINGS/ADD PARTIES
None without Court approval
DISCOVERY CUTOFF
Not Applicable as case is being litigated
on the Administrative Record
PLAINTIFF TO FILE AFFIRMATIVE MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT:
October 30, 2018
DEFENDANT TO FILE A SINGLE/JOINT MOTION
OPPOSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION WITH ITS OWN
CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT:
November 13, 2018
PLAINTIFF TO FILE A REPLY A SINGLE/JOINT REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF HIS/HER MOTION WITH AN
OPPOSITION TO THE CROSS-MOTION:
November 27, 2018
20
DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE
CROSS-MOTION ONLY:
December 4, 2018
21
HEARING
December 18, 2018
14
15
16
17
18
19
22
With respect to Rule 52 briefing, each party shall meet and confer on the appropriate
23
standard of review and confirm the same within the briefing. Any disagreement with respect to
24
this issue shall be raised with the Court no later than thirty (30) days prior to the filing of the
25
opening brief by way of the Court’s procedure on summary judgment practice. See Standing
26
Order in Civil Cases ¶ 9.
27
\\
28
\\
2
1
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
2
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All
3
Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 11, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?