Andrew C. et al v. Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan et al

Filing 36

SCHEDULING AND SEALING ORDER re 35 Status Report filed by Andrew C., Robert C., United Healthcare Insurance Company, Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan. Plaintiff to file affirmative Motion for Judgment by 10/30/2018. Defendan t to file a Single/Joint Motion opposing Plaintiff's Motion with its own Cross-Motion for Judgment by 11/13/2018. Plaintiff to file a Reply a Single/Joint Reply in Support of his/her Motion with an Opposition to the Cross-Motion by 11/27/2018. Defendant to file a Reply in Support of the Cross-Motion Only by 12/4/2018. Motion Hearing set for Tuesday 12/18/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/11/18.* The Friday, 10/12/18 Compliance hearing is VACATED. *(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ANDREW C., ET AL., 7 Plaintiffs, 9 10 SCHEDULING AND SEALING ORDER vs. 8 CASE NO. 17-cv-02072-YGR ORACLE AMERICA INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN, ET AL., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The Court has read and reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report. (Dkt. No. 35). The 13 Court reserves on the issue regarding the breach of fiduciary duty claim. Any request for 14 discovery must be made by motion. Given that this case arises under the Employee Retirement 15 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., the Court will not set a date 16 17 18 for a bench trial until briefing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 is completed. 1 If required, a bench trial can be scheduled on a fairly expedited basis. A case management conference can be scheduled if required by contacting the Court’s courtroom deputy. See Standing Order in Civil Cases ¶ 12. 19 Defendant shall preserve the administrative record. The parties shall meet and confer on 20 21 22 23 the scope of the administrative record and agree upon deadlines for resolution of this issue. The administrative record shall be delivered to the Court seven (7) days prior to the filing of the first brief referenced below and in the manner set forth herein: First, the parties shall file a Notice of Manual Filing on the docket; 24 Second, a physical copy of the administrative record (Bate-stamped and double-sided 25 pages) shall be delivered in three-ringed binders. The administrative record shall include 26 27 28 1 Should the parties determine that a bench trial will be required, rather than (or in conjunction with) resolution on the papers, the Court will discuss the issue with the parties at the next case management conference and modify the schedule if necessary. 1 an index and be segregated in appropriate categories, such as medical records, third party 2 expert reports, etc. 3 Third, an electronic copy of the administrative record shall be filed under seal pursuant to 4 this Order. Given the anticipated size of the record, it will likely be filed in “parts” which shall be indexed to allow for easy access to the documents. The index shall be separately 5 filed. In addition, the parties shall deliver the electronic form of the administrative record 6 in CDs or thumb-drive(s) along with the physical copy. The electronic copy shall allow 7 for electronic searching. 8 9 PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 LAST DAY TO AMEND PLEADINGS/ADD PARTIES None without Court approval DISCOVERY CUTOFF Not Applicable as case is being litigated on the Administrative Record PLAINTIFF TO FILE AFFIRMATIVE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT: October 30, 2018 DEFENDANT TO FILE A SINGLE/JOINT MOTION OPPOSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION WITH ITS OWN CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT: November 13, 2018 PLAINTIFF TO FILE A REPLY A SINGLE/JOINT REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS/HER MOTION WITH AN OPPOSITION TO THE CROSS-MOTION: November 27, 2018 20 DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE CROSS-MOTION ONLY: December 4, 2018 21 HEARING December 18, 2018 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 With respect to Rule 52 briefing, each party shall meet and confer on the appropriate 23 standard of review and confirm the same within the briefing. Any disagreement with respect to 24 this issue shall be raised with the Court no later than thirty (30) days prior to the filing of the 25 opening brief by way of the Court’s procedure on summary judgment practice. See Standing 26 Order in Civil Cases ¶ 9. 27 \\ 28 \\ 2 1 The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 2 Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All 3 Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: October 11, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?