Big Baboon, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 82 Stipulation for Extension of Claim Construction Proceedings. Discovery due by 4/19/2019; Motions due by 5/3/2019; Responses due by 5/17/2019; Replies due by 5/24/2019; Tutorial Hearing set for 5/31/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor and Claims Construction Hearing set for 6/7/2019 02:00 PM. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Robert H. Sloss, (SBN 87757) robert.sloss@procopio.com PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP 1117 California Ave., Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650.645.9000 Facsimile: 619.235.0398 Lance D. Reich, pro hac vice lreich@helsell.com Kevin E. Regan, (SBN 262335) kregan@helsell.com HELSELL FETTERMAN LLP 1001 Fourth Ave., Suite 4200 Seattle, WA 98154 Telephone: 206.292.1144 Facsimile: 206.340.0902 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 BIG BABOON, INC., Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Defendants SAP AMERICA, INC. and HP INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff Big Baboon, Inc. 14 17 J. Christopher Carraway (pro hac vice) chris.carraway@klarquist.com Klaus H. Hamm (SBN 224905) klaus.hamm@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 595-5300 Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 v. Case No. 4:17-cv-02082-HSG JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SAP AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Big Baboon Inc. (“Big Baboon”) and Defendants 23 24 25 26 SAP America, Inc. and HP Inc. (“Defendants”) hereby submit this Stipulation To Extend Dates In Scheduling Order For Claim Construction Proceedings by six weeks. This includes the following deadlines and the Technology Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing set in the 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:17-cv-02082-HSG 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Scheduling Order (ECF No. 58) and modified by the Order Extending Dates in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 81) (or as agreed by the parties): Litigation Event Description of the Substance of Expert Witness’ Proposed Testimony Pursuant to L.R. 4-2(b) Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to L.R. 4-3 Claim Construction Discovery Cut-Off Pursuant to L.R. 4-4 Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to L.R. 4-5 Defendant’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to L.R. 4-5 Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to L.R. 4-5 Technology Tutorial 16 17 Claim Construction Hearing 18 19 20 Previous Date February 4, 2019 Requested Date March 18, 2019 February 6, 2019 March 20, 2019 March 8, 2019 April 19, 2019 March 22, 2019 May 3, 2019 April 5, 2019 May 17, 2019 April 12, 2019 May 24, 2019 At the convenience of the Court, on or after April 19, 2019 At the convenience of the Court, on or after April 26, 2019 At the convenience of the Court, on or after May 31, 2019 At the convenience of the Court, on or after June 7, 2019 The reasons for the requested six-week extension of these dates is set forth below, and in the accompanying Declaration of J. Christopher Carraway. 21 22 1. On November 15, 2018, the Court heard argument on Defendants’ Motion for 23 Summary Judgment of Invalidity (ECF No. 60) and took the motion under advisement. A 24 decision granting the motion would make claim construction proceedings moot. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:17-cv-02082-HSG 2 1 2 3 2. The parties are about to commence the most resource-intensive phase of claim construction, including expert disclosures, claim construction discovery (including the 4 possibility of expert depositions), claim construction briefs, a Technology Tutorial, and 5 finally the Claim Construction Hearing. 6 7 8 9 10 3. The parties seek this six-week extension to avoid expending significant party and Court resources on claim construction proceedings at this time given that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity is pending. 4. The prior time modifications in this case are: (1) on May 10, 2018, the Court 11 granted (ECF No. 40) the parties’ stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for Motion to 12 Dismiss Big Baboon’s First Amended Complaint; (2) on November 23, 2018, the parties 13 stipulated to extend Defendants’ deadline for its Patent LR 4-1 disclosure from November 14 15 16 17 23, 2018 to November 28, 2018; (3) on November 28, 2018, the parties agreed to extend the deadline for expert disclosures under Patent LR 4-2(b) from December 14, 2018 to January 7, 2019; (4) on January 3, 2019, the parties agreed to extend the deadline for expert disclosures 18 under Patent LR 4-2(b) from January 7, 2019 to January 14, 2019, and on January 4, 2019, 19 agreed to extend that deadline again to February 4, 2019; (5) on January 4, 2019, the parties 20 filed a stipulation extending the all other claim construction deadlines by four weeks, a 21 22 23 24 stipulation this Court signed on January 6, 2019. 5. The parties’ current proposed extension will not affect any other dates scheduled for the case, as the only dates scheduled thus far are the dates at issue in this stipulation. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:17-cv-02082-HSG 3 1 2 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, submitted with this stipulation is the Declaration of J. Christopher Carraway, which (1) sets forth with particularity, the reasons for the requested 4 enlargement or shortening of time; (2) discloses all previous time modifications in the case, 5 whether by stipulation or Court order; and (3) describes the effect the requested time 6 modification would have on the schedule for the case. 7 8 Dated: January 31, 2019 PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP 9 By: s/ Lance D. Reich Robert H. Sloss (SBN. 87757) Lance D. Reich (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin E. Regan (SBN 262335) 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Big Baboon, Inc. 13 14 KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 15 By: s/ Klaus H. Hamm J. Christopher Carraway (pro hac vice) chris.carraway@klarquist.com Klaus H. Hamm (SBN 224905) klaus.hamm@klarquist.com 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 595-5300 Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 Attorney for Defendants SAP AMERICA, INC. and HP INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ATTESTATION 23 The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been 24 obtained from each of the other Signatories. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:17-cv-02082-HSG 4 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The deadlines in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 58) are amended as follows: Litigation Event Description of the Substance of Expert Witness’ Proposed Testimony Pursuant to L.R. 4-2(b) Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to L.R. 4-3 Claim Construction Discovery Cut-Off Pursuant to L.R. 4-4 Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to L.R. 4-5 Defendant’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to L.R. 4-5 Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to L.R. 4-5 Technology Tutorial 11 12 Claim Construction Hearing 13 14 15 16 17 March 20, 2019 April 19, 2019 May 3, 2019 May 17, 2019 May 24, 2019 At the convenience of the May 31, 2019 at 2 p.m. Court, on or after May 31, 2019 At the 2019 at 2 p.m. June 7,convenience of the Court, on or after June 7, 2019 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ________________ 2/1/2019 ___________________________________________ THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date March 18, 2019 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:17-cv-02082-HSG 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?