Fowler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 69

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 68 Stipulation for Second Extension of Stay of Deadlines in Scheduling Order. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2018)

1 MCGUIREWOODS LLP
DAVID S. REIDY SBN #225904
2 Two Embarcadero Center
Suite 1300
3 San Francisco, CA 94111-3821
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 K. Issac deVyver (appearing pro hac vice)
Karla L. Johnson (appearing pro hac vice)
6 Tower Two-Sixty
260 Forbes Avenue, Suite 1800
7 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3142
Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: [phone]
9 Sara F. Holladay-Tobias (appearing pro hac vice)
50 North Laura Street, Suite 3300
10 Jacksonville, FL 32202
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]
12 Attorneys for Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17 VANA FOWLER, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
18
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
21
Defendant.
22

CASE NO. 4:17-cv-02092-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND
EXTENSION OF STAY OF DEADLINES
IN SCHEDULING ORDER AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF STAY OF DEADLINES IN SCHEDULING ORDER

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Vana Fowler and Defendant Wells

2 Fargo Bank, N.A., hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:
3

WHEREAS, on November 17, 2017, the Court issued an Order staying the case pending

4 mediation on January 15, 2018 (“Stay Order”) [D.E. 57];
5

WHEREAS, the Parties mediated this case before Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) on January

6 15, 2018;
7

WHEREAS, the Parties did not fully resolve the case, but made sufficient progress at

8 mediation that they requested an extension of the stay through February 23, 2018 to continue
9 settlement negotiations, and the Court entered an Order extending the stay on January 19, 2018
10 [D.E. 66];
11

WHEREAS, the Parties remain in ongoing discussions regarding the terms of a potential

12 settlement and need to pull additional information and data to continue the settlement discussions;
13

WHEREAS, the Parties request a final, thirty-day extension of the stay to continue

14 settlement discussions without the added expense of litigation and discovery;
15

WHEREAS, the Parties will submit a proposed briefing scheduling if a class settlement is

16 reached, or a scheduling order to address any deadlines affected by the stay if settlement negotiations
17 reach an impasse, by March 26, 2018;
18

NOW THEREFORE the parties through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate to, and

19 respectfully request the Court to order, that the stay of the case be extended through March 26, 2018.
20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22

DATED: February 23, 2018

23
/s/ Adam L. Hoipkemier______________
24 Adam L. Hoipkemier
Epps Holloway DeLoach & Hoipkemier LLP
25 6 Concourse Parkway, Suite 2920
26 Atlanta, GA 30328

/s/ K. Issac deVyver
K. Issac deVyver
McGuireWoods LLP
Tower Two-Sixty
260 Forbes Avenue, Suite 1800
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3142

27 Counsel for Plaintiff Vana Fowler

Counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

28
1
JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF STAY OF DEADLINES IN SCHEDULING ORDER

1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
Dated:
5

2/26/2018
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF STAY OF DEADLINES IN SCHEDULING ORDER