Webcor Construction, LP et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company, et al
Filing
203
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/26/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2018)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
5
6
WEBCOR CONSTRUCTION, LP, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
9
10
CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
7
8
Case No. 17-cv-02220-YGR
Defendants.
OLD REPUBLIC GENERAL INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
Third Party Plaintiff,
v.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
13
Third Party Defendant,
14
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
15
The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:
16
17
18
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
REFERRED TO ADR FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
COMPLETED BY:
TO BE
April 20, 2018
LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:
Only with Court Approval
19
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
August 1, 2018
20
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT REPORTS--ALL EXPERTS,
RETAINED AND NON-RETAINED MUST PROVIDE
WRITTEN REPORTS COMPLIANT WITH FRCP
26(A)(2)(B):
Opening: August 24, 2018
Rebuttal: September 17, 2018
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
September 28, 2018
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE
HEARD BY:
COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)
November 13, 2018
Friday, January 18, 2019 at 9:01 a.m.
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:
January 18, 2019
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
Friday, February 8, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.
27
1
28
See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for
summary judgment.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:
Monday, February 25, 2019 at 8:30
a.m. for Jury Trial
Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall
meet and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance hearing on Friday,
January 18, 2019 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the Court’s
Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing shall be
held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5)
business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT
STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to
comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be
taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint
statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
As set forth above, the parties are REFERRED to private mediation. The parties shall
provide the Court with the name of an agreed-upon mediator and date of mediation by February 9,
2018 by filing a JOINT Notice. A compliance hearing regarding shall be held on Friday, February
16, 2018 on the Court's 9:01a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland,
California, in courtroom 1. By February 9, 2018, the parties shall file either the JOINT Notice or
a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If
compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off
calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement
in a timely fashion.
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All
Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2018
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?