Harry v. KCG Americas LLC et al

Filing 125

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 124 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Sanctions.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JEFFRY HENDERSON (pro hac vice) hendersonj@gtlaw.com ROBERT CHRISTIE (pro hac vice) christier@gtlaw.com KATHARINE L. MALONE (SBN: 290884) malonek@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 655-1300 Facsimile: (415) 707-2010 Attorneys for Defendants KCG Americas LLC, Daniel B. Coleman, Carl Gilmore, Greg Hostetler, Main Street Trading, Inc., Patrick J. Flynn, Edward W. Wedbush and Wedbush Securities Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 BRIGHT HARRY, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CASE NO. 4:17-CV-2385-HSG Plaintiff, v. NOTICE OF MOTION AND DEFENDANTS KCG AMERICAS LLC, DANIEL B. COLEMAN, CARL GILMORE, GREG HOSTETLER, MAIN STREET TRADING, INC., PATRICK J. FLYNN, EDWARD W. WEDBUSH AND WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC.’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND ORDER KCG AMERICAS LLC, DANIEL B. COLEMAN, CARL GILMORE, GREG HOSTETLER, MAIN STREET TRADING, INC., PATRICK J. FLYNN, WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC., EDWARD W. WEDBUSH, ION TRADING, INC, ANDREA PIGNATARO, ROBERT SYLVERNE, COMPUTER VOICE Complaint Filed: April 26, 2017 SYSTEMS, INC., PAUL STURM, and SCOTT Amended Complaint Filed: May 16, 2017 WILLIAM BENZ, Second Amended Complaint Filed: April 3, 2018 Defendants. Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., presiding 24 25 26 27 28 DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CHI 69513110v2 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants KCG Americas LLC, Daniel B. Coleman, Carl 3 4 5 6 7 Gilmore, Greg Hostetler, Main Street Trading, Inc., Patrick J. Flynn , Edward W. Wedbush and Wedbush Securities Inc. (collectively, “Wedbush”) hereby move the Court for entry of an order allowing thirty days to file a Motion for Sanctions against plaintiff Bright Harry. DATED: August 29, 2018 8 By:__/s/ Robert B. Christie______ Robert B. Christie 9 10 One of Defendants’ Attorneys 11 KCG Americas LLC, Daniel B. Coleman, Carl Gilmore, Greg Hostetler, Main Street Trading, Inc., Patrick J. Flynn, Edward W. Wedbush and Wedbush Securities Inc. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 1 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 6 -1 of this Court’s Civil Local Rules, Defendants KCG Americas LLC, Daniel B. Coleman, Carl Gilmore, Greg Hostetler, Main Street Trading, Inc., Patrick J. Flynn, Edward W. Wedbush and Wedbush Securities Inc. (collectively “Wedbush”) respectfully request the entry of an order extending the time to file a Motion for Sanctions against plaintiff Bright Harry, and in support state as follows: 8 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. filing of a 39 page Complaint. On May 16, 2017, Harry amended his Complaint (“First Amended Complaint”) without leave of court. The First Amended Complaint consisted of 79 pages of allegations. On April 3, 2018, following the Court’s dismissal of his First Amended Complaint, Harry again amended his complaint (the “Second Amended Complaint”), this time with leave of the Court.1 Harry’s Second Amended Complaint consisted of 89 pages of allegations. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Bright Harry (“Harry”) commenced this action on April 26, 2017, through the 2. The contemptuous conduct reflected in the referenced complaints merely foreshadowed Harry’s bad faith and vexatious actions that would follow. Following receipt of his First Amended Complaint, Wedbush served Harry on August 3, 2017, with a Rule 11 Notice, wherein Wedbush demanded that Harry dismiss his action against Wedbush. 3. 21 Not only did Harry ignore the Rule 11 Notice served on him, Harry actively assisted 22 Ronald Draper (“Draper”) in drafting and filing a separate action on April 27, 2018, against the identical 23 defendants that were named in this action (Docket No. 18-cv-02524). 24 4. 25 pending motions. 26 5. On August 27, 2018, the Court dismissed Harry’s (and Draper’s) Complaints and all Wedbush intends to file a Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions against plaintiff Bright Harry for 27 28 1 Harry titled his Second Amended Complaint as “First Amended Complaint.” To eliminate confusion, the title “Second Amended Complaint” will be used in this Motion. 2 DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 1 the recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action , and requests 30 days to file its Motion 2 for Sanctions and supporting documents. 3 4 5 6 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, KCG Americas LLC, Daniel B. Coleman, Carl Gilmore, Greg Hostetler, Main Street Trading, Inc., Patrick J. Flynn, Edward W. Wedbush and Wedbush Securities Inc, 7 respectfully request the entry of an order allowing Wedbush 30 days, or until on or before September 8 28, 2018, to file their Motion for Sanctions and supporting documents, and for such further relief that 9 the Court finds necessary under the circumstances. 10 DATED: August 29, 2018 By:__/s/ Robert B. Christie Robert B. Christie 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants KCG Americas LLC, Daniel B. Coleman, Carl Gilmore, Greg Hostetler, Main Street Trading, Inc., Patrick J. Flynn, Edward W. Wedbush and Wedbush Securities Inc. S DISTRIC 15 16 17 S 25 Ju ER y wo o d d ge H a H 24 RT 23 NO 22 D DENIE S. Gillia m Jr. LI 21 DATED: 8/30/2018 TC A 20 UNIT ED 19 E AT T RT U O 18 R NIA 14 FO 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 3 DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?