Williams v. State of California et al
Filing
34
ORDER RE VIDEO CONFERENCE TESTIMONY AT EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/16/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DWAIN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
Case No. 17-cv-02511-HSG
ORDER RE VIDEO CONFERENCE
TESTIMONY AT EVIDENTIARY
HEARING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to
14
exhaust administrative remedies. See Dkt. No. 8. Following the hearing and supplemental
15
briefing on the motion, the Court scheduled a limited evidentiary hearing to determine whether
16
Plaintiff Dwain Williams exhausted the available administrative remedies under the Prison
17
Litigation Reform Act. Dkt. No. 19. On October 6, 2017, Defendants identified Timothy William
18
Brown as one of their witnesses for the October 27, 2017, evidentiary hearing because of Mr.
19
Brown’s role in assisting Plaintiff with an inmate appeal. See Dkt. No. 32 at 3. Mr. Brown is
20
currently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility (CDCR No. G38339). Id. To
21
facilitate Mr. Brown’s testimony, the Court ORDERS that Mr. Brown may testify via video
22
conference from the California Health Care Facility. Defendants shall coordinate with the Court’s
23
deputy clerk to ensure the video conference is set up in advance of the hearing.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/16/2017
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?