Joseph Bisaccia v. Revel Systems Inc.

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 38 Stipulation Regarding Continuance of October 17, 2017 Further Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 10/24/2017; Case Management Conference set for 10/31/2017 02:00 PM. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MOLLIE M. BURKS (SBN 222112) mburks@gordonrees.com SARA A. MOORE (SBN 294255) smoore@gordonrees.com GORDON & REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant REVEL SYSTEMS, INC. Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 250451 helland@nka.com Daniel S. Brome, CA State Bar No. 278915 dbrome@nka.com NICHOLS KASTER, LLP 235 Montgomery St., Suite 810 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 277-7235 Facsimile: (415) 277-7238 Attorneys for PLAINTIFF and those similarly situated 15 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 16 17 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND JOSEPH BISACCIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 23 24 vs. REVEL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-cv-02533-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 17, 2017 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Complaint Filed: May 3, 2017 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 17, 2017 FURTHER CASE MAST MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 17-cv-02533-HSG 1 2 3 4 The parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Stipulation Regarding Continuance of October 17, 2017 Further Case Management Conference. WHEREAS, on October 6, 2017, the Court set a Further Case Management Conference for October 17, 2017 at 2 p.m.; 5 WHEREAS, Mollie M. Burks, lead counsel for Defendant, is unavailable on October 17, 6 2017 because she is starting trial on October 16, 2017 in AudienceArc, Inc. et al. v. Spark Public 7 Relations, LLC et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-16-552836; 8 9 WHEREAS, Sara A. Moore, counsel for Defendant, is also unavailable on October 17, 2017 due to preplanned, out-of-town travel; WHEREAS, Ms. Burks’ trial is expected to last until approximately October 30, 2017; 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 10 NOW THEREFORE, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which is 12 hereby acknowledged, Plaintiff and Defendant and stipulate and agree as follows: 13 In light of the above, the Further Case Management Conference, which is currently set 14 for October 17, 2017 at 2 p.m., should be continued to a later date when lead counsel for 15 Defendant is available. The parties request that the Further Case Management Conference be set 16 for October 30, 2017 or later, at a date and time convenient for the Court. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 18 Dated: October 16, 2017 19 20 GORDON & REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP By: /s/ Sara A. Moore MOLLIE M. BURKS SARA A. MOORE Attorneys for Defendant REVEL SYSTEMS, INC. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: October 16, 2017 NICHOLS KASTER LLP By: /s/ Daniel S. Brome MATTHEW C. HELLAND DANIEL S. BROME Attorneys for PLAINTIFF 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 17, 2017 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 17-cv-02533-HSG 1 2 3 OR RDER PURS SUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS S ORDER SO RED. The Fur rther Case M Management Conference is continued from Octobe 17, 2017 a 2 p.m. to O C s f er at October 31, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 0 4 5 6 DATED: Oct D tober 16, 201 17 _ __________ ___________ __________ _________ H Hon. Haywo S. Gillia Jr. ood am, 7 8 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REV/113666 66/35276628v.1 -3 3STIPULATIO AND ORDER REGARD S ON DING CONTIN NUANCE OF OCTOBER 17, 2017 FUR F RTHER CASE E MANAGEMENT CONFERENC – Case No. 17-cv-02533C CE . -HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?