Sincerny v. City of Walnut Creek

Filing 25

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 24 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 DAVID M. HELBRAUN (SBN 129840) HELBRAUN LAW FIRM 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3340 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 982-4000 Facsimile: (415) 421-0912 dmh@helbraunlaw.com   5 Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL ALFRED SINCERNY 6   7   8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA     10   11 PAUL ALFRED SINCERNY, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. C17-02616 HSG   12 City of Walnut Creek; Walnut Creek Police Department; Walnut Creek Police Sergeant Ryan Hibbs; Walnut Creek Police Officer Lee Herrington; Walnut Creek Police Officer Brookshire; Walnut Creek Police Officer Adams; Walnut Creek Police Officer Ashley Roskos; Walnut Creek Police Officer Njoroge; Walnut Creek Police Officer Steve Bertolozzi; Walnut Creek Police Detective Kim Gerstner; Walnut Creek Police Officer Scott Moorhouse; Walnut Creek Police Chief Tom Chaplin, Rachel Melia Smith and DOES 1-20,       STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE OCTOBER 12 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTION TO DISMISS   22 Defendants.   23   24 WHEREAS Defendants on August 25 filed and served a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to   25 Dismiss; and   26 WHEREAS on August 28, the said Motion to Dismiss was re-noticed for hearing to take   27 place on October 12, 2017; and 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING   SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTION TO DIMSISS – C17-02616 HSG 1 WHEREAS under local court rules plaintiff’s Opposition would normally be due on or   2 before Friday September 8; and   3 WHEREAS plaintiff’s counsel is a solo practitioner and must travel to Los Angeles for a 4 hearing this week, and has depositions two out of the four business days next week following the 5 Labor Day Holiday, which prior business commitments substantially impair his ability to research 6 and draft a thorough Opposition by September 8;         7 NOW THEREFORE the parties, by and through their respective attorneys, have agreed 8 that good cause exists in the interest of the furtherance of justice that the briefing schedule on said 9 Motion to Dismiss be modified, and propose therefore to the Court that plaintiff’s Opposition be 10 filed and served no later than Friday September 15, and the defendants’ Reply briefing on or 11 before September 22, well before the re-noticed October 12 hearing date.   ATTOR NEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATT Y, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP         12 We hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from   13 each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 14 Dated: August 29, 2017   HELBRAUN LAW FIRM   15 By: /s/ Helbraun, David M David M. Helbraun Attorneys for Plaintiff Paul Alfred Sincerny 16 17   18 Dated: August 29, 2017 19 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 20 By:   23 /s/ Blechman, Noah G. Noah G. Blechman Attorneys for Defendants City of Walnut Creek; Walnut Creek Police Sergeant Ryan Hibbs; Walnut Creek Police Officer Lee Herrington; Walnut Creek Police Officer Adams; and Walnut Creek Police Officer Ashley Roskos 24 ORDER 21 22     25 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, AND CAUSE EXSITING THEREFORE, IT 26 IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:     27 Plaintiff’s Opposition briefing with regard to defendants’ pending Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to 28 Dismiss shall be filed and served no later than September 15, 2017, and defendants’ Reply     STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – C17-02616 HSG 2 1 briefing shall be filed and served no la than Sep b ater ptember 22, 2 2017.   2 IT IS SO ORDERE S ED   3 Da ated: 8/30/2 2017 By:_ _   Hon. Hay ywood S. Gi illiam, Jr. District C Court Judge 4   5   6   7 8   ATTOR NEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATT Y, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CO D ONTINUE INITIA AL CA MANAGEME ASE ENT CONFERENCE – C17-02616 HSG H 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?