Sincerny v. City of Walnut Creek
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 24 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
DAVID M. HELBRAUN (SBN 129840)
HELBRAUN LAW FIRM
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3340
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 982-4000
Facsimile: (415) 421-0912
dmh@helbraunlaw.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PAUL ALFRED SINCERNY
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL ALFRED SINCERNY,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No. C17-02616 HSG
12
City of Walnut Creek; Walnut Creek Police
Department; Walnut Creek Police Sergeant
Ryan Hibbs; Walnut Creek Police Officer
Lee Herrington; Walnut Creek Police
Officer Brookshire; Walnut Creek Police
Officer Adams; Walnut Creek Police
Officer Ashley Roskos; Walnut Creek
Police Officer Njoroge; Walnut Creek
Police Officer Steve Bertolozzi; Walnut
Creek Police Detective Kim Gerstner;
Walnut Creek Police Officer Scott
Moorhouse; Walnut Creek Police Chief
Tom Chaplin, Rachel Melia Smith and
DOES 1-20,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE
OCTOBER 12 HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTION TO
DISMISS
22
Defendants.
23
24
WHEREAS Defendants on August 25 filed and served a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to
25
Dismiss; and
26
WHEREAS on August 28, the said Motion to Dismiss was re-noticed for hearing to take
27
place on October 12, 2017; and
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTION TO
DIMSISS – C17-02616 HSG
1
WHEREAS under local court rules plaintiff’s Opposition would normally be due on or
2
before Friday September 8; and
3
WHEREAS plaintiff’s counsel is a solo practitioner and must travel to Los Angeles for a
4
hearing this week, and has depositions two out of the four business days next week following the
5
Labor Day Holiday, which prior business commitments substantially impair his ability to research
6
and draft a thorough Opposition by September 8;
7
NOW THEREFORE the parties, by and through their respective attorneys, have agreed
8
that good cause exists in the interest of the furtherance of justice that the briefing schedule on said
9
Motion to Dismiss be modified, and propose therefore to the Court that plaintiff’s Opposition be
10
filed and served no later than Friday September 15, and the defendants’ Reply briefing on or
11
before September 22, well before the re-noticed October 12 hearing date.
ATTOR NEYS AT LAW
3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523
TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330
McNAMARA, NEY, BEATT Y, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
12
We hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from
13
each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.
14
Dated: August 29, 2017
HELBRAUN LAW FIRM
15
By:
/s/ Helbraun, David M
David M. Helbraun
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Paul Alfred Sincerny
16
17
18
Dated: August 29, 2017
19
MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,
BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
20
By:
23
/s/ Blechman, Noah G.
Noah G. Blechman
Attorneys for Defendants
City of Walnut Creek; Walnut Creek Police Sergeant
Ryan Hibbs; Walnut Creek Police Officer Lee
Herrington; Walnut Creek Police Officer Adams; and
Walnut Creek Police Officer Ashley Roskos
24
ORDER
21
22
25
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, AND CAUSE EXSITING THEREFORE, IT
26
IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
27
Plaintiff’s Opposition briefing with regard to defendants’ pending Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to
28
Dismiss shall be filed and served no later than September 15, 2017, and defendants’ Reply
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – C17-02616 HSG
2
1
briefing shall be filed and served no la than Sep
b
ater
ptember 22, 2
2017.
2
IT IS SO ORDERE
S
ED
3
Da
ated: 8/30/2
2017
By:_
_
Hon. Hay
ywood S. Gi
illiam, Jr.
District C
Court Judge
4
5
6
7
8
ATTOR NEYS AT LAW
3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523
TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330
McNAMARA, NEY, BEATT Y, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CO
D
ONTINUE INITIA
AL
CA MANAGEME
ASE
ENT CONFERENCE – C17-02616 HSG
H
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?