Sincerny v. City of Walnut Creek

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Stipulation and Proposed Order. Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2017; Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2017 02:00 PM. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DAVID M. HELBRAUN (SBN 129840) HELBRAUN LAW FIRM 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3340 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 982-4000 Facsimile: (415) 421-0912 dmh@helbraunlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL ALFRED SINCERNY 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL ALFRED SINCERNY, Case No. C17-02616 HSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 City of Walnut Creek; Walnut Creek Police Department; Walnut Creek Police Sergeant Ryan Hibbs; Walnut Creek Police Officer Lee Herrington; Walnut Creek Police Officer Brookshire; Walnut Creek Police Officer Adams; Walnut Creek Police Officer Ashley Roskos; Walnut Creek Police Officer Njoroge; Walnut Creek Police Officer Steve Bertolozzi; Walnut Creek Police Detective Kim Gerstner; Walnut Creek Police Officer Scott Moorhouse; Walnut Creek Police Chief Tom Chaplin, Rachel Melia Smith and DOES 1-20, 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE ORDER Defendants. 23 24 WHEREAS the Court recently set October 31, 2017 as the new date for a Case 25 Management Conference in this matter and to discuss a due date for Plaintiff’s First Amended 26 Complaint; and 27 28 WHEREAS Plaintiff counsel is set for trial in State court to commence on October 30, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE ORDER C17-02616 HSG 1 2017, in the matter of Cochran v. Lake, San Mateo Superior Court No. CIV531946, and the case 2 may “trail” some days and is otherwise expected to last for approximately two weeks; and 3 4 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel is scheduled for hip replacement surgery on November 27, 2017 and will therefore be physically unavailable for about two weeks; and 5 6 WHEREAS plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel have met and conferred to propose an orderly modification to the Case Management Conference schedule; NOW THEREFORE the parties, by and through their respective attorneys, have agreed 8 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 that good cause exists in the interest of the furtherance of justice that the schedule for the Case 9 Management Conference be adjusted such that the said Conference take place on Tuesday 10 November 21, 2017, and a joint Case Management Conference Statement be filed on November 11 14, 2017. 12 Dated: October 18, 2017 13 HELBRAUN LAW FIRM By: 14 15 16 Dated: October 18, 2017 ______/s/__Helbraun, David M David M. Helbraun Attorneys for Plaintiff Paul Alfred Sincerny 17 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 18 By: 21 /s/ Blechman, Noah G. Noah G. Blechman Attorneys for Defendants City of Walnut Creek; Walnut Creek Police Sergeant Ryan Hibbs; Walnut Creek Police Officer Lee Herrington; Walnut Creek Police Officer Adams; and Walnut Creek Police Officer Ashley Roskos 22 ORDER 19 20 23 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE EXSITING 24 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 25 XXX 26 XXX 27 XXX 28 XXX STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE ORDER C17-02616 HSG 2 1 2 3 4 The Ca Managem Confer ase ment rence shall ta place on Tuesday November 21, 2017, and a ake n joi Case Ma int anagement Conference Statement sha be filed o November 14, 2017. C all on IT IS SO ORDERE S ED Da ated: Octobe 23, 2017 er 5 By:_ ___________ __________ ______ Hon. Hay ywood S. Gi illiam, Jr. District C Court Judge 6 8 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MO D ODIFY CASE ANAGEMENT CO ONFERENCE DA ORDER ATE MA C1 17-02616 HSG 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?