Tauanuu v. Loancare, LLC et al
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 Stipulation selecting Mediation.. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Leslie D. Tauanuu,
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-02742 HSG
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Loancare, LLC, et al,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process.
_____________________________________________
Dated: July 25, 2017.
See attached page 3 for additional counsel.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
/s/ Mark F. Anderson
Attorney for Plaintiff
[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 7/31/2017
______________________________
__ _________ ____ ___________
______________________________
__
UNITED STATES JUDGE
JUDGE
D
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?