United States of America v. Approximately $214,225 in United States Currency

Filing 27

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S OCTOBER 4, 2017 ORDER. Show Cause Response due by 10/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on October 13, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 17-cv-02891-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 Defendant. 12 On May 19, 2017, Plaintiff the United States of America (“Plaintiff”) filed a verified 13 complaint for forfeiture. [Docket No. 1]. On July 17, 2017, Claimant Dejanique Blackwell 14 (“Claimant”) filed a verified claim. [Docket No. 11]. The court held the initial Case Management 15 Conference on October 4, 2017. [Docket No. 24]. At the Case Management Conference, the 16 court ordered Claimant to file a letter indicating whether she is requesting a bench or jury trial by 17 no later than October 11, 2017. 10/4/17 Minute Order [Docket No. 24]. No letter has been filed. 18 In light of the above, the court issues this Order to Show Cause as to why Claimant should 19 not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the court’s order. Claimant is ordered to respond in 20 writing by no later than October 18, 2017, and show cause why she should not be sanctioned for 21 failure to comply with the court’s order. ER R NIA M. Ryu FO onna Judge D H 28 RT 27 Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge NO 26 DERED SO OR ______________________________________ IT IS LI 25 Dated: October 13, 2017 A 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 23 S 22 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 APPROXIMATELY $214,225 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S OCTOBER 4, 2017 ORDER N D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?