United States of America v. Approximately $214,225 in United States Currency

Filing 44

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED.Show Cause Response due by 12/18/2017.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on December 12, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 17-cv-02891-DMR v. APPROXIMATELY $214,225 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED Re: Dkt. No. 40 13 On November 17, 2017, Claimant Dejanique Blackwell (“Claimant”) filed a motion to 14 suppress in this civil forfeiture action. [Docket No. 40]. In the motion, Claimant averred facts in 15 support of the motion, but submitted no declaration attesting to those facts. Instead, Claimant 16 asserted that the facts would be “amplified” by sworn testimony. Mot. at 3 (“Here it is further 17 being contended that the facts (when amplified with sworn testimony which will envelop the 18 averments made below) will show . . .”). Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff”) filed a 19 timely opposition in which it argued that the facts of the motion were undisputed due to the 20 absence of sworn facts proffered by Claimant. [Docket No. 42]. Claimant did not file a reply. 21 In light of the above, the court orders Claimant to show cause in writing by no later than 22 December 18, 2017 why the motion to suppress should not be denied for failure to provide sworn 23 facts. Failure to respond to this order may result in denial of the motion to suppress. IT IS SO ORDERED. S ______________________________________ yu on Donna na M. R Judge D M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge E NO 27 ERED O ORD IT IS S RN A H 28 LI RT FO Dated: December 12, 2017 26 RT U O 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 24 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?