Moralez v. Coffee Shop, LP et al
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to File a Responsive Pleading and to Extend Deadline to Conduct General Order 56 Joint Site Inspection. Case Management Statement due by 10/24/2017; Case Management Conference set for 10/31/2017 02:00 PM.. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sue J. Stott, Bar No. 91144
SStott@perkinscoie.com
Aaron J. Ver, Bar No. 295409
AVer@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
505 Howard Street, Suite 1000
San Francisco, CA 94105-3204
Telephone: 415.344.7000
Facsimile: 415.344.7050
Attorneys for Defendants
COFFEE SHOP, LP dba COFFEE SHOP and Penny
Pickett, Trustee of the Living Trust of Nellie J.
Prentice dated May 2, 1988, as amended on June 29,
1989 and April 13, 1993
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
FRANCISCA MORALEZ,
Case No. 4:17-CV-02912-HSG
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
COFFEE SHOP, LP. dba COFFEE SHOP,
et al.,
Defendants.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE
PLEADINGS AND TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO CONDUCT GENERAL
ORDER 56 JOINT SITE INSPECTION;
ORDER
Complaint filed:
May 22, 2017
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND EXTEND
DEADLINE TO CONDUCT G.O. 56 JOINT INSPECTION
Case No: 4:17-CV-02912-HSG
1
Plaintiff Francisca Moralez (“Moralez”) and Defendants Coffee Shop LP dba Coffee
2
Shop (“Coffee Shop”) and Penny Pickett, Trustee of the Living Trust of Nellie J. Prentice dated
3
May 2, 1988, as amended on June 29, 1989 and April 13, 1993 (“Landlord”) (collectively,
4
“Defendants,” and together with Moralez, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel,
5
hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
6
This matter arises out of Moralez’s claim that she was discriminated against by
7
Defendants on account of her disability when she encountered conditions at Defendants’
8
business that she alleges interfered with her full and equal access thereto in violation of Title III
9
of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). This matter therefore proceeds under this
10
District’s General Order 56 which governs ADA access matters.
2.
11
The Scheduling Order issued under General Order 56 (Dkt. 5) requires that the
12
Parties, and their consultants (if desired), participate in a joint site inspection of the subject
13
property on or before September 5, 2017.
3.
14
As of September 5, 2017, Defendants have engaged and are now represented by
15
Perkins Coie LLP. Prior to September 5, Coffee Shop was proceeding in pro per and was
16
representing the interests of the Landlord. The Parties have been working on a settlement of all
17
claims raised in the litigation. The Parties respectfully request that the Defendants’ deadline to
18
respond to the Complaint be extended to September 12, 2017, and the deadline to complete the
19
joint site inspection be extended from September 5, 2017 to October 11, 2017. As such, the
20
Parties have agreed to conduct the joint site inspection on October 11, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. in order
21
to afford the Parties additional time needed to finalize a settlement and, if necessary, to allow the
22
Parties sufficient time thereafter for the site inspection.
4.
23
The Parties also respectfully request that all other dates triggered by the joint site
24
inspection be continued accordingly, including the date of the Case Management Conference and
25
the deadline to submit a case management conference statement to the Court. Specifically, the
26
Parties agree the Case Management Conference set for September 12, 2017 can be continued and
27
suggest a date after October 11, 2017.
28
//
-2-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND
EXTEND DEADLINE TO CONDUCT G.O. 56 JOINT INSPECTION
Case No: 4:17-CV-02912-HSG
1
DATED: September 5, 2017
PERKINS COIE LLP
2
By: /s/ Aaron J. Ver
Sue J. Stott
Aaron J. Ver
3
4
Attorneys for Defendants
COFFEE SHOP, LP dba COFFEE SHOP; and
Penny Pickett, Trustee of the Living Trust of
Nellie J. Prentice dated May 2, 1988, as
amended on June 29, 1989 and April 13, 1993
5
6
7
8
DATED: September 5, 2017
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
9
10
11
12
By: /s/ Zachary M. Best
Tanya E. Moore
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FRANCISCA MORALEZ
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND
EXTEND DEADLINE TO CONDUCT G.O. 56 JOINT INSPECTION
Case No: 4:17-CV-02912-HSG
ORD
DER
1
2
The Pa
arties having so stipulate and good cause appea
g
ed
aring,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date Defen
O
t
ndants may f their resp
file
ponse to the
e
4
omplaint is September 12, 2017, an the Parti are to co
S
1
nd
ies
onduct the j
joint site in
nspection on
n
co
5
Oc
ctober 11, 20 at 1:00 p.m. All oth dates trig
017
p
her
ggered by the date of the joint site in
e
e
nspection are
e
6
7
als continued accordingl The case manageme conferen statemen is due on October 24,
so
d
ly.
e
ent
nce
nt
20 and the case manage
017,
ement confe
erence is resc
cheduled to O
October 31, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
0
8
9
10
11
T
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Da
ated: Septem
mber 6, 2017
7
HAY
YWOOD S. G
GILLIAM, J
JR
Unite States District Judge
ed
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4 ST
TIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A R
D
S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING A
E
AND
EX
XTEND DEAD
DLINE TO CO
ONDUCT G.O. 56 JOINT INS
SPECTION
Ca No: 4:17-CV-02912-HSG
ase
G
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?