Silva v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et al

Filing 19

MDL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE Southern District of New York. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2017)

Case MDL No. 2754 Document 176 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ELIQUIS (APIXABAN) PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL No. 2754

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -8)

On February 7, 2017, the Panel transferred 18 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Southern District ofNew York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 21 additional action(s) have
been transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such
actions have been assigned to the Honorable Denise L. Cote.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District ofNew York and assigned to
Judge Cote.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order ofF ebruary 7, 2017, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Denise L. Cote.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Southern District ofNew York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.

I Jun 13, 20171
CLERK'S OFFICE
UN!TED STATES
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIOISTRICT LITIGATION

FOR THE PANEL:

#IF~---·-·-Jeffery N. Luthi
Clerk of the Panel

A CERTifiED COPY
RUB)\ J. KRAJICK, CLERK

BY~k:z::/k~
Deputy rk

Case MDL No. 2754 Document 176 Filed 06/13/17 Page 2 of 3

IN RE: ELIQUIS (APIXABAN) PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL No. 2754

SCHEDULE CT0-8- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN

4

17-03016

Silva v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et al

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

00609
00610
00611
00612
00613
00614
0061§
00616
00617
00618
00619
00620
00621
00622

~tiessHel' v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17

p

006~7

DELAWARE

BE
9E
BE

BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
9E

BE
BE
BE
9E

BE
9E

BE
9E
9E
9E

BE
9E
9E
9E

BE
BE
BE

BE
BE

0062~

00624
0062§
00626
00627
00628
00629
006~0
006~1
006~2

006~~
006~4
006~§

006~6

Heleeme v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
PeterseH v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Rtttk KeHHeH v. Bristel Meyers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/
YettHg v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Judith Carel Trae~' v. Bristel Meyers SEj:uiee Ce. et al opposed 6/1
StriekliH v. Bristel Meyers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
LiHda WhiteY. Bristel Meyers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/1
Stetler v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Small, Jr. v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Musiek v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Taffitersley v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Kelley v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
MuffB:y v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
ReddeH v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Beeth Y. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
JaekseH v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
FerteHeu~· et al v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12.
LeffFede v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
E:z~ell v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Oia:l et al v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
OehH v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Gemez v. Bristel M~·ers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
GreeH v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Velleses v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Methersked v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
MeGriff v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
SpaHH v. Bristel Myers SEj:ttiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Baker v. Bristel Myers SEj:uiee Ce. et al Opposed 6/12/17

Case MDL No. 2754 Document 176 Filed 06/13/17 Page 3 of 3

+
+
+
+

17
17
17
17

00638
00639
00640
00641

Hoose¥ v. BFistol MyeFs Squibb Co. et al Opposed 6/12/17
PaFkeF v. BFistol Myefs Squibb Co. et al Opposed 6/12/17
Messef v. BFistol MyeFs Squibb Co. et al Opposed 6/12/17
JoHes v. BFistol MyeFs Squibb Co. et al Opposed 6/12/17