Sieler v. Atieva USA, Inc.
Filing
31
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 29 Stipulation re Discovery of Electronically Stored Information.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
JOSEPH R. LORDAN, SB# 265610
Email: Joseph.Lordan@lewisbrisbois.com
2
CHINA WESTFALL, SB# 300982
Email: China.Westfall@lewisbrisbois.com
3
333 Bush Street, Suite 1100
4 San Francisco, California 94104-2872
Telephone: 415.362.2580
5 Facsimile: 415.434.0882
6 Attorneys for ATIEVA USA, INC. dba LUCID
MOTORS USA, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11 MARCEL SIELER, an individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14 ATIEVA USA, INC. dba LUCID MOTORS
USA, INC., a California corporation; and
15 DOES 1-20, inclusive,
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-03152-DMR
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY
STORED INFORMATION FOR
STANDARD LITIGATION
The Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Trial Date:
October 22, 2018
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
1. PURPOSE
This Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”) in this case
20 as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s Guidelines for the
21 Discovery of Electronically Stored Information, and any other applicable orders and rules.
22
23
2. COOPERATION
The parties are aware of the importance the Court places on cooperation and commit to
24 cooperate in good faith throughout the matter consistent with this Court’s Guidelines for the
25 Discovery of ESI.
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3. LIAISON
The parties have identified liaisons to each other who are and will be knowledgeable
28 about and responsible for discussing their respective ESI. Each e-discovery liaison will be, or
4843-6954-6319.1
4:17-cv-03152-DMR
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION FOR
STANDARD LITIGATION
1 have access to those who are, knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery,
2 including the location, nature, accessibility, format, collection, search methodologies, and
3 production of ESI in this matter. The parties will rely on the liaisons, as needed, to confer about
4 ESI and to help resolve disputes without court intervention.
5
6
4. PRESERVATION
The parties have discussed their preservation obligations and needs and agree that
7 preservation of potentially relevant ESI will be reasonable and proportionate. To reduce the
8 costs and burdens of preservation and to ensure proper ESI is preserved, the parties agree that:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
(a) Only ESI created or sent/received between January 1, 2015 to present by Marcel
Sieler, Steffen Jentsch, Max Klimke, Raymund Köhler, Sven Häeussler, Derek
Jenkins, Alexander Girard, Thomas Fleuret, Peter Rawlinson, Joann Jung, Jared
Strawderman, James Kim, Mark Gianassi, Shai Ron, Simon Tildesley, Doug Haslam,
Chelsea Blake, Eric Bach, Hans-Christoph Eckstein, Wiebke Eckstein, Ralf MeyerWendt, Christopher Burton, Sheila Xu, and Andrea Consola will be preserved at this
time;
(b) The parties shall add or remove custodians from the list above as reasonably
necessary going forward;
(c) The parties agree to preserve the following types of ESI: emails; electronic
documents/files (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, etc.); and work product generated by the
Rhinoceros 3D, Grasshopper, Inkscape, Sketchup, and Catia software. Specific file
types to be preserved include: .xls, .xlsx, .ppt, .pptx, .3dm (Rhinoceros 3D), .gh
(Grasshopper), .svg (Inkscape), .eps, .png, .jpg, .jpeg, .doc, .docx, .pdf, .tiff, .skp
(Sketchup), .catpart (Catia), .iges (Rhinoceros 3D), .step (Rhinoceros 3D), .stp
(Rhinoceros 3D), .stl (Rhinoceros 3D);
19
(d) The parties agree not to preserve backup data created before January 1, 2015; and
20
(e) In addition to the agreements above, the parties agree data from the following
sources (i) could contain relevant information, but (ii) under the proportionality
factors, do not need to be preserved: ESI created or sent/received by current and
former employees of Atieva USA, Inc. d/b/a Lucid Motors USA, Inc. other than the
custodians listed in subsection 4(a), above, subject to any changes made pursuant to
subsection 4(b), above.
21
22
23
24
25
5. SEARCH
The parties agree that in responding to any Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 request, they will meet and
26 confer about the methods to search ESI including, but not limited to keyword search terms, in
27 order to identify ESI that is subject to production in discovery and filter out ESI that is not
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 subject to discovery.
4843-6954-6319.1
4:17-cv-03152-DMR
2
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION FOR
STANDARD LITIGATION
1
6. PRODUCTION FORMATS
The parties agree to produce documents in ☑ PDF, ☐TIFF, ☑native or ☑paper or a
2
3 combination thereof (check all that apply)] file formats. If particular documents warrant a
4 different format, the parties will cooperate to arrange for the mutually acceptable production of
5 such documents. The parties agree not to degrade the searchability of documents as part of the
6 document production process.
7
7. PHASING
When a party propounds discovery requests pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, where
8
9 applicable, the parties agree to phase the production of ESI as reasonably needed. The initial
10 production will be from the following sources and custodians: Peter Rawlinson, Eric Bach, Ralf
11 Meyer-Wendt, Marcel Sieler, Steffen Jentsch, Derek Jenkins, Alexander Girard, Christopher
12 Burton, Mark Gianassi, and Doug Haslam. Following the initial production, the parties will
13 continue to prioritize the order of subsequent productions.
14
8. DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY
15
(a) Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of a privileged or work-productprotected document, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of privilege or
protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. For
example, the mere production of privileged or work-product-protected documents in
this case as part of a mass production is not itself a waiver in this case or in any other
federal or state proceeding.
16
17
18
(b) Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint
need not be placed on a privilege log. Communications may be identified on a
privilege log by category, rather than individually, if appropriate.
19
20
21
9. MODIFICATION
22
This Stipulated Order may be modified by a Stipulated Order of the parties or by the
23 Court for good cause shown.
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 / / /
4843-6954-6319.1
4:17-cv-03152-DMR
3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION FOR
STANDARD LITIGATION
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
2
3 DATED: September 14, 2017
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
4
5
By:
6
7
8
/s/ China M. Westfall
Joseph R. Lordan
China M. Westfall
Attorneys for ATIEVA USA, INC. dba LUCID
MOTORS USA, INC.
9
10 DATED: September 14, 2017
SOHN LEGAL GROUP, P.C.
11
12
By:
13
14
/s/ David Sohn
David D. Sohn, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARCEL SIELER
15
16
IT IS ORDERED that the forgoing Agreement is approved.
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
21
UNIT
ED
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
19
19 DATED: September ___, 2017
S
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ER
H
24
25
FO
onn
Judge D
LI
RT
23
u
a M. Ry
NO
22
A
17
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4843-6954-6319.1
4:17-cv-03152-DMR
4
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION FOR
STANDARD LITIGATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?