Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc.

Filing 55

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 54 Stipulation TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC Plaintiff, 10 12 IRVINE ATTORNEYS AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP v. 11 13 YAHOO!, INC., Defendant. 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 4:17-cv-03188-HSG Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) FOR LACK OF PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 DATE: Thursday, August 24, 2017 TIME: 2:00 p.m. LOCATION: COURTROOM 2, 4TH Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 4:17-CV-03188-HSG 1 Befor the Cour is Plainti Hyperm re rt iff media Navigation LLC and De C’s efendant 2 Yahoo!, Inc.’s (“the Pa arties”) Sti ipulation to Extend th Briefing Schedule for o he g e 3 Yahoo!’s mo otion to dismiss this case (“Stip pulation”). . 4 The Court havin reviewe the Parti Stipula C ng ed ies’ ation, and g good cause e 5 ap ppearing, th Court ru as foll he ules lows: The hearing sc chedule is hereby ext tended. 6 Pl laintiff’s re esponse to Defendant motion is due on July 24, 20 t’s 017. Defen ndant’s 7 re eply in supp of Def port fendant’s motion is d on Aug 7, 201 m due gust 17. 8 9 PU URSUANT TO STIP T PULATION IT IS SO ORDER N, O RED. 11 DATE July 10, 2017 ED: 1 12 IRVINE ATTORNEYS AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 Hon Hayward S. Gilliam Jr. n. d m, UNI ITED STA ATES DIST TRICT JUD DGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR RDER GRANTIN STIPULATION TO EXTEN NG ND BR RIEFING SCHED DULE ON MOT TION TO DISMISS -2- 4:17-CV-0 03188-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?