Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc.
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 54 Stipulation TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC
Plaintiff,
10
12
IRVINE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
v.
11
13
YAHOO!, INC.,
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 4:17-cv-03188-HSG
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) FOR
LACK OF PATENTABLE SUBJECT
MATTER UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101
DATE: Thursday, August 24, 2017
TIME: 2:00 p.m.
LOCATION: COURTROOM 2, 4TH Floor,
1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO
DISMISS
4:17-CV-03188-HSG
1
Befor the Cour is Plainti Hyperm
re
rt
iff
media Navigation LLC and De
C’s
efendant
2
Yahoo!, Inc.’s (“the Pa
arties”) Sti
ipulation to Extend th Briefing Schedule for
o
he
g
e
3
Yahoo!’s mo
otion to dismiss this case (“Stip
pulation”).
.
4
The Court havin reviewe the Parti Stipula
C
ng
ed
ies’
ation, and g
good cause
e
5
ap
ppearing, th Court ru as foll
he
ules
lows: The hearing sc
chedule is hereby ext
tended.
6
Pl
laintiff’s re
esponse to Defendant motion is due on July 24, 20
t’s
017. Defen
ndant’s
7
re
eply in supp of Def
port
fendant’s motion is d on Aug 7, 201
m
due
gust
17.
8
9
PU
URSUANT TO STIP
T
PULATION IT IS SO ORDER
N,
O
RED.
11
DATE July 10, 2017
ED:
1
12
IRVINE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
10
Hon Hayward S. Gilliam Jr.
n.
d
m,
UNI
ITED STA
ATES DIST
TRICT JUD
DGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OR
RDER GRANTIN STIPULATION TO EXTEN
NG
ND
BR
RIEFING SCHED
DULE ON MOT
TION TO
DISMISS
-2-
4:17-CV-0
03188-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?