Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc.

Filing 62

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 61 Stipulation to Substitute Party. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC Plaintiff, v. 10 12 IRVINE ATTORNEYS AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP YAHOO!, INC., 11 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 4:17-cv-03188-HSG Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ORDER ON STIPULATION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY 4:17-CV-03188-HSG 1 ORD DER 2 Plaintiff Hypermed Navigation LLC (“H dia Hypermedia” and Defen ”) ndant Yahoo! Inc. 3 (“Y Yahoo!”), (c collectively “the Parties” filed a Sti “ ”), ipulation to Substiute Pa pursuan to Fed. R. arty nt 4 Ci P. 15(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) (“the Stipu iv. a C ) ulation”). Th Stipulatio states that Yahoo! Inc. he on t 5 an Yahoo Ho nd oldings, Inc. (“Yahoo Ho oldings”) de sire to amen the case caption to ref nd flect Yahoo 6 Ho oldings’ new status as de w efendant in this action an to substit parties a t nd tute accordingly. 7 PURSU UANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS O S ORDERED t Yahoo H that Holdings, Inc is c. 8 su ubstituted as defendant in place of Ya n ahoo! Inc., a that the c and case caption shall be am n mended as 9 follows: 11 HY YPERMEDI NAVIGA IA ATION LLC C 12 IRVINE ATTORNEYS AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 YA AHOO HOL LDINGS, IN NC., Defend dant. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:17-cv-03 .: 3188-HSG IT IS SO ORDERED. T 20 21 Da ated: 7/12/20 017 22 ____ ___________ __________ ___________ __________ _ THE HONORAB HAYW E BLE WOOD S. GI ILLIAM, JR R. UNIT TED STATE DISTRIC COURT JUDGE ES CT 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR RDER ON STI IPULATION TO T SU UBSTITUTE PARTY P -2- 4:17-CV-0 03188-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?