Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc.
Filing
62
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 61 Stipulation to Substitute Party. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
10
12
IRVINE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
YAHOO!, INC.,
11
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 4:17-cv-03188-HSG
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
SUBSTITUTE PARTY
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
SUBSTITUTE PARTY
4:17-CV-03188-HSG
1
ORD
DER
2
Plaintiff Hypermed Navigation LLC (“H
dia
Hypermedia” and Defen
”)
ndant Yahoo! Inc.
3
(“Y
Yahoo!”), (c
collectively “the Parties” filed a Sti
“
”),
ipulation to Substiute Pa pursuan to Fed. R.
arty
nt
4
Ci P. 15(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) (“the Stipu
iv.
a
C
)
ulation”). Th Stipulatio states that Yahoo! Inc.
he
on
t
5
an Yahoo Ho
nd
oldings, Inc. (“Yahoo Ho
oldings”) de sire to amen the case caption to ref
nd
flect Yahoo
6
Ho
oldings’ new status as de
w
efendant in this action an to substit parties a
t
nd
tute
accordingly.
7
PURSU
UANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS O
S
ORDERED t Yahoo H
that
Holdings, Inc is
c.
8
su
ubstituted as defendant in place of Ya
n
ahoo! Inc., a that the c
and
case caption shall be am
n
mended as
9
follows:
11
HY
YPERMEDI NAVIGA
IA
ATION LLC
C
12
IRVINE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
10
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
YA
AHOO HOL
LDINGS, IN
NC.,
Defend
dant.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-03
.:
3188-HSG
IT IS SO ORDERED.
T
20
21
Da
ated: 7/12/20
017
22
____
___________
__________
___________
__________
_
THE HONORAB HAYW
E
BLE
WOOD S. GI
ILLIAM, JR
R.
UNIT
TED STATE DISTRIC COURT JUDGE
ES
CT
23
24
25
26
27
28
OR
RDER ON STI
IPULATION TO
T
SU
UBSTITUTE PARTY
P
-2-
4:17-CV-0
03188-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?