Harris v. Davis et al

Filing 51

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 50 Joint Request Regarding Further Settlement Conference and (Docket No. 49 ) Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2020)

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ request, the matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman

3

for a further settlement conference to be conducted in April or May 2020, or at a time that is

4

convenient for the Court’s schedule. Briefing on Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions, ECF No. 49, is

5

stayed while the parties further assess settlement. If the matter does not resolve at the settlement

6

conference, Defendants’ response shall be due 21 days after a notice indicating that the case did

7

not settle is entered on the Court’s docket, and Plaintiff’s reply shall be due 14 days after

8

Defendants’ response is filed.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated: ___________________________
3/20/2020

__________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
U. S. District Court

12
13
14

SF2018400847

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Joint Request Re: Further Settlement Conf. and Pl.’s Mot. Sanctions; [Proposed] Order (4:17-cv-03269-HSG-RMI)