Sharp Corporation v. Hisense Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 74

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re Notice 73 . Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/3/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2018)

Download PDF
1 BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP Eric M. George (State Bar No. 166403) 2 egeorge@bgrfirm.com Ira Bibbero (State Bar No. 217518) 3 ibibbero@bgrfirm.com 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2800 4 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 274-7100 5 Facsimile: (310) 275-5697 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sharp Corporation 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 SHARP CORPORATION, 13 Case No. 17-CV-3341-YGR The Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 HISENSE CO., LTD.; HISENSE USA 16 CORPORATION; HISENSE ELECTRIC CO., LTD; HISENSE USA MULTIMEDIA 17 R&D CENTER, INC.; and HISENSE INTERNATIONAL (HONG KONG) 18 AMERICA INVESTMENT CO., LTD., 19 Defendants. 20 Trial Date: None Set 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 981216.1 Case No. 17-CV-3341-YGR Notice of Dismissal of Action Pursuant to Rule 41(a) 1 TO THE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Sharp 3 Corporation hereby gives notice that the above-titled action is dismissed as to all defendants who 4 have not heretofore been dismissed. 5 6 DATED: December 22, 2017 7 BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP Eric M. George Ira Bibbero 8 9 By: /s/ Ira Bibbero Ira Bibbero Attorneys for Plaintiff Sharp Corporation 10 11 12 13 14 15 ER 1/3/2018 H 22 23 N D IS T IC T R ers LI RT 21 alez Rog R NIA S nz onne Go Judge Yv NO 20 DERED O OR IT IS S A 19 Dated: January 3, 2018 UNIT ED 18 RT U O 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 16 OF C 24 25 26 27 28 981216.1 -1Notice of Dismissal of Action Pursuant to Rule 41(a) Case No. 17-CV-3341-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?