Semicaps PTE Ltd v. Hamamatsu Corporation et al
Filing
128
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 125 Defendant's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed on 7/19/2021.(dmrlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)
Case 4:17-cv-03440-DMR Document 128 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SEMICAPS PTE LTD,
Case No. 17-cv-03440-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL
9
10
HAMAMATSU CORPORATION, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 125
Defendants.
12
On July 6, 2021, Defendant Hamamatsu Corporation filed an administrative motion to seal
13
its motion for leave to take third party discovery out of town, seeking to file under seal the entire
14
motion itself, the proposed subpoenas, and two exhibits in support of the motion. [Docket No.
15
125.] Defendant moved to seal these materials solely on the grounds that they “contain
16
information derived from” materials that Plaintiff SEMICAPS PTE Ltd. designated as confidential
17
and highly confidential. However, the motion is not “narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of
18
sealable material,” see Civ. L.R. 79-5(b), and Plaintiff has not filed a responsive declaration as
19
required by Civil Local Rules 79-5(e)(1) and 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that these documents are
20
sealable. Therefore, the motion to seal is denied.
28
R NIA
S
Jud
ER
H
27
RT
26
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu. Ryu
United Donna M
ge States Magistrate Judge
NO
25
I
ERED
FO
24
Dated: July 19, 2021
ORD
T IS SO
LI
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
21
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?