Moralez v. Lutticken Incorporated et al

Filing 9

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 8 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335)
[e-mail]
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
LUTTICKEN INCORPORATED

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANCISCA MORALEZ,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.
LUTTICKEN INCORPORATED dba
LUTTICKEN’S; ROBERT W.
LUTTICKEN, Trustee of THE
LUTTICKEN LIVING TRUST dated
October 24, 1994; JEANNIE B.
LUTTICKEN, Trustee of THE
LUTTICKEN LIVING TRUST dated
October 24, 1994;
Defendants.

19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:17-cv-03534-HSG
SECOND STIPULATION AND
REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT;
ORDER
Complaint Filed: June 20, 2017
Complaint Served: June 30, 2017
Current
Response Date:
New
Response Date:

September 29, 2017
October 13, 2017

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
41290873v.1

1

Plaintiff Francisca Moralez (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Lutticken Incorporated,

2

Robert W. Lutticken, and Jeannie B. Lutticken (“Defendants”) jointly stipulate to extend

3

the time for Defendants to respond to the initial complaint from September 29, 2017 to

4

October 13, 2017.

5

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), this extension will affect only the October 3

6

deadline under GO 56 for the parties to conduct a join inspection of the property at issue

7

in the Complaint. The parties have agreed to conduct the joint inspection and required

8

meet and confer on October 25. This extension will not alter the date of any other event

9

or any deadline already fixed by Court order. This stipulation is made in good faith and

10

not for the purpose of causing unwarranted delay, but to allow the parties time to further

11

explore informal resolution. This is Defendants’ second request for an extension.

12
13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14
15

DATED: September 29, 2017

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

16
17

By /s/ Kristina M. Launey
Kristina M. Launey

18

Attorneys for Defendants
LUTTICKEN INCORPORATED,
ROBERT W. LUTTICKEN, JEANNIE B.
LUTTICKEN

19
20
21
22

DATED: September 29, 2017

23

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

By

24
25

/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best

Attorneys for Plaintiff
FRANCISCA MORALEZ

26
27
28

1
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
41290873v.1

I, Kristina M. Launey attest tha concurren in the filing of th stipulat
,
M
y,
at
nce
his
tion has
been ob
btained from the signa
m
atory Zach
hary M. Be counsel for Plaint
est,
tiff.

D:
ber
17
DATED Septemb 29, 201

SEYFART SHAW LLP
S
TH

By /s/ Kris
B
stina M. La
auney
Krist M. La
tina
auney
Attorneys f Defend
A
for
dants
LUTTICKE INCOR
L
EN
RPORATE
ED,
ROBERT W LUTTI
R
W.
ICKEN, JE
EANNIE B
B.
LUTTICKE
L
EN

PURSUANT TO STIPU
P
T
ULATION, IT IS SO O
I
ORDERED.
DATED: October 2, 2017
:
,
UNITE STATES DISTRICT COURT JU
ED
T
UDGE

2
41290873v.1