TSI USA LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc

Filing 45

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 44 Stipulation ENLARGING TIME FOR FILING OF OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANT'S 42 MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2017)

1
2
3

SHEBAR LAW FIRM
Steven M. Shebar (pro hac vice application to be submitted)
[e-mail]
110 N. Gables Blvd.
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
Telephone: [phone]

4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
9
10

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Brian C. Rocca, Bar No. 221576
[e-mail]
Geoffrey T. Holtz, Bar No. 191370
[e-mail]
Ellie F. Chapman, Bar No. 305473
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001

11
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17

TSA USA LLC,

Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG
Plaintiff,

18
19

v.

20

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

21

Defendant.

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
ENLARGING TIME FOR FILING OF
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS IN
CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

22
23
Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of California
24
(“Local Rules”), Plaintiff TSI USA, LLC (“TSI”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.
25
(“Uber”), by their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby submit their Joint Stipulation
26
Enlarging Time for Filing Of Opposition and Reply Briefs in Connection with Defendant’s
27
Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
ENLARGING TIME
Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG

1

1.

Plaintiff asked Defendant’s consent for an enlargement of time in which to file its

2

opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s undergoing an

3

unforeseen, serious medical issue. Defendant’s counsel consented to the requested extension of

4

four total days (two business days), from September 28 to October 2, 2017, for the filing of

5

Plaintiff’s Opposition. The parties agreed to an equal extension for Defendant’s reply, from

6

October 12 to October 16, 2017.

7

2.

The original briefing schedule was the result of a So-Ordered stipulation, entered

8

on August 25, 2017, based on “the parties agreement that efficiency would be served by

9

continuing the Case Management Conference until a date after the proposed hearing on the

10

motion to dismiss, to help logically sequence case events.” Other than this stipulation, there have

11

been no previous time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court order.

12

3.

The effect on scheduled matters in the case, other than the parties’ briefing

13

schedule, is shortening from 14 days to 10 days, the time between the filing of the reply and the

14

hearing before this Court on the motion to dismiss, which is set for October 26, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

15
16

THEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows, and
request that the Court enter an order re-setting the remaining briefing schedule as follows:

17

1.

Plaintiff shall file its opposition to the motion on or before October 2, 2017.

18

2.

Defendant shall file its reply on or before October 16, 2017.

19

3.

The hearing date for the motion to dismiss shall remain unchanged.

20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
23

Dated: September 29, 2017

By

/s/ Brian C. Rocca
Brian C. Rocca1

24
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Attorneys for Defendant

25
26
27
1

28

Brian C. Rocca, the filer of this document, hereby attests that he obtained the concurrence of the
other signatory, Steven M. Shebar, prior to its filing.
2

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
ENLARGING TIME
Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG

1

Da
ated: Septem
mber 29, 201
17

B
By

/s/ Steven M. Shebar
n
Steven M. Shebar

2
S
SHEBAR LA FIRM
AW
A
Attorneys fo Plaintiff
or

3
4
5
6

ORD
DER

7
8

PURSUANT TO STIPULAT
TION, IT IS SO ORDE
S
ERED.

9
10

ated: October 2, 2017
Da
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

JOINT ST
TIPULATION AND ORDER
N
R
ENLA
ARGING TIME
E
C
Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG
G