TSI USA LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc

Filing 61

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 60 Stipulation Re Choice of Law and Related Issues. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 SHEBAR LAW FIRM Steven M. Shebar (pro hac vice) steveshebar@shebarlaw.com 110 N. Gables Blvd. Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Telephone: 630.877.6833 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PRATHER LAW OFFICES Edwin K. Prather, CABN 190536 edwin@pratherlawoffices.com 245 Fifth Street, Suite 103 San Francisco, CA 94013 Telephone: 415.881.7774 Attorneys for Plaintiff MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Brian C. Rocca, Bar No. 221576 brian.rocca@morganlewis.com Geoffrey T. Holtz, Bar No. 191370 geoffrey.holtz@morganlewis.com Ellie F. Chapman, Bar No. 305473 ellie.chapman@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105-1596 Telephone: 415.442.1000 Attorneys for Defendant 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION 18 19 TSA USA LLC, Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG Plaintiff, 20 21 v. 22 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 23 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES Defendant. Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 24 25 On October 17, 2017, the Court entered an order entitled, ORDER DIRECTING 26 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS. See Dkt. No. 59. 27 Following that Order, the parties met and conferred relating to choice-of-law and related issues. 28 JOINT STIPULATION & ORDER RE CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG 1 The pa arties reached an agreem that Cali d ment ifornia subst tantive law a applies to thi action. is 2 Plaintiff requested an opportun to file a supplement to its oppos nity t sition brief to address the o e 3 thi claim for relief (for fraud) under California l ird r f law. Defend agreed t that reque dant to est. 4 5 Defend requeste an opport dant ed tunity to file a reply in re e esponse to th proposed he d su upplemental opposition. Plaintiff agr reed to that r request. 6 7 THER REFORE, the parties, thro e ough their un ndersigned c counsel, STI IPULATE an request nd tha the Court enter an OR at RDER, as fol llows: 8 1. California substantive law shall app in this ac s l ply ction. 9 2. Plaintiff sh file, on or before Nov hall o vember 2, 20 017, a suppl lement to its opposition 10 br rief, not to ex xceed three pages, relatin to its thir claim for r p ng rd relief (for fra aud). 11 3. Defendant shall file, on or before N n November 9, 2017, a brie in reply to Plaintiff’s , ef o 12 su upplemental opposition brief, not to exceed three pages. b e e 13 IT IS SO STI T IPULATED D. 14 Da ated: October 31, 2017 B By /s/ Brian C. Rocca n Brian C. Rocca1 15 M MORGAN, L LEWIS & B BOCKIUS L LLP A Attorneys fo Defendant or t 16 17 Da ated: October 31, 2017 B By /s/ Steven M. Shebar n Steven M. Shebar 18 S SHEBAR LA FIRM AW A Attorneys fo Plaintiff or 19 20 21 ORD DER TION, IT IS SO ORDE S ERED. PURSUANT TO STIPULAT 22 23 24 ated: October 31, 2017 Da UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE D 25 26 27 1 28 Brian C. Roc the filer of this docu B cca, ument, hereb attests tha he obtaine the concur by at ed rrence of the e oth signatory Steven M. Shebar, pri to its filin her y, ior ng. 2 J JOINT STIPULA ATION & ORD DER RE CHOICE E OF LAW AND REL LATED ISSUES S C Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG G

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?