TSI USA LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc

Filing 61

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 60 Stipulation Re Choice of Law and Related Issues. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017)

1
2
3

SHEBAR LAW FIRM
Steven M. Shebar (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
110 N. Gables Blvd.
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
Telephone: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

PRATHER LAW OFFICES
Edwin K. Prather, CABN 190536
[e-mail]
245 Fifth Street, Suite 103
San Francisco, CA 94013
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Brian C. Rocca, Bar No. 221576
[e-mail]
Geoffrey T. Holtz, Bar No. 191370
[e-mail]
Ellie F. Chapman, Bar No. 305473
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1596
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

OAKLAND DIVISION

18
19

TSA USA LLC,

Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG
Plaintiff,

20
21

v.

22

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

23

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED
ISSUES

Defendant.

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

24
25

On October 17, 2017, the Court entered an order entitled, ORDER DIRECTING

26

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS. See Dkt. No. 59.

27

Following that Order, the parties met and conferred relating to choice-of-law and related issues.

28
JOINT STIPULATION & ORDER RE CHOICE
OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES

Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG

1

The pa
arties reached an agreem that Cali
d
ment
ifornia subst
tantive law a
applies to thi action.
is

2

Plaintiff requested an opportun to file a supplement to its oppos
nity
t
sition brief to address the
o
e

3

thi claim for relief (for fraud) under California l
ird
r
f
law. Defend agreed t that reque
dant
to
est.

4
5

Defend requeste an opport
dant
ed
tunity to file a reply in re
e
esponse to th proposed
he
d
su
upplemental opposition. Plaintiff agr
reed to that r
request.

6
7

THER
REFORE, the parties, thro
e
ough their un
ndersigned c
counsel, STI
IPULATE an request
nd
tha the Court enter an OR
at
RDER, as fol
llows:

8

1.

California substantive law shall app in this ac
s
l
ply
ction.

9

2.

Plaintiff sh file, on or before Nov
hall
o
vember 2, 20
017, a suppl
lement to its opposition

10

br
rief, not to ex
xceed three pages, relatin to its thir claim for r
p
ng
rd
relief (for fra
aud).

11

3.

Defendant shall file, on or before N
n
November 9, 2017, a brie in reply to Plaintiff’s
,
ef
o

12

su
upplemental opposition brief, not to exceed three pages.
b
e
e

13

IT IS SO STI
T
IPULATED
D.

14

Da
ated: October 31, 2017

B
By

/s/ Brian C. Rocca
n
Brian C. Rocca1

15
M
MORGAN, L
LEWIS & B
BOCKIUS L
LLP
A
Attorneys fo Defendant
or
t

16
17

Da
ated: October 31, 2017

B
By

/s/ Steven M. Shebar
n
Steven M. Shebar

18
S
SHEBAR LA FIRM
AW
A
Attorneys fo Plaintiff
or

19
20
21

ORD
DER
TION, IT IS SO ORDE
S
ERED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULAT

22
23
24

ated: October 31, 2017
Da
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D

25
26
27
1

28

Brian C. Roc the filer of this docu
B
cca,
ument, hereb attests tha he obtaine the concur
by
at
ed
rrence of the
e
oth signatory Steven M. Shebar, pri to its filin
her
y,
ior
ng.
2

J
JOINT STIPULA
ATION & ORD
DER RE CHOICE
E
OF LAW AND REL
LATED ISSUES
S

C
Case No. 4:17-cv-03536-HSG
G