American, Etc., Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc.
Filing
31
ORDER Striking 30 Objection filed by American, Etc., Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/4/2018. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AMERICAN, ETC., INC.,
Plaintiff,
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Case No. 17-cv-03660-DMR
v.
APPLIED UNDERWRITERS CAPTIVE
RISK ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC.,
ORDER STRIKING PETITIONER’S
OBJECTION TO DECEMBER 28, 2017
ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 30
Defendant.
14
15
Petitioner American Etc, Inc. dba Royal Laundry (“Royal”) filed a document entitled
16
“Objection to Magistrate’s Recommendation to Confirm Arbitration Award” on January 4, 2018.
17
[Docket No. 30.] In its filing, Royal purports to object pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
18
Procedure 72(b) to the court’s December 28, 2017 Order Granting Motion to Confirm Arbitration
19
Award and Denying Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (Docket No. 28). However, Rule 72(b)
20
is inapplicable, as both parties consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) “to have a United States
21
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including . . . entry of final
22
judgment,” and agreed that “appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States
23
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.” [Docket Nos. 7 (Pet’r’s Consent), 15 (Resp’t’s Consent).]
24
Accordingly, the January 4, 2018 Objection is stricken.
25
To the extent Royal seeks reconsideration of the December 28, 2017 Order, it must seek
26
leave to file a motion for reconsideration in compliance with Local Rule 7-9. The court notes that
27
pursuant to Local Rule 7-9(c), “[n]o motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration may
28
repeat any oral or written argument made by the applying party in support of or in opposition to
the interlocutory order which the party now seeks to have reconsidered.”
2
S
Judge D
D
RDERE
onn
H
ER
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
FO
RT
8
R NIA
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States MagistrateaJudge yu
M. R
7
United States District Court
Northern District of California
OO
IT IS S
LI
6
UNIT
ED
5
Dated: January 4, 2018
RT
U
O
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
NO
3
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?