Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al

Filing 51

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/12/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2017)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., ET AL.,

Case No. 17-cv-03672-YGR

Plaintiffs,
5
v.

CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER

6
7

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9
10

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:

Monday, April 23, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

13

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

April 2, 2018

14

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT REPORTS:

15

Opening: April 16, 2018
Rebuttal: May 14, 2018

16

ALL EXPERTS, RETAINED AND NON-RETAINED
MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN REPORTS COMPLIANT
WITH FRCP 26(A)(2)(B):

17

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

June 1, 2018

18

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE
HEARD BY:

September 4, 2018

19

[Motions filed by 7/3/18]
Oppositions filed 7/24/18; Reply filed
8/15/18

20
21
COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)

Friday, November 28, 2018 at 9:01 a.m.

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:

December 5, 2018

24

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:

Friday, January 3, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

25

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:

Monday, January 28, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. for
Jury Trial

22
23

26
27
1

28

See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for
summary judgment.

1

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet

2

and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance hearing on Friday, November

3

28, 2018 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the Court’s Pretrial

4

Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing shall be held in the

5

Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business

6

days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT

7

STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to

8

comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be

9

taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing

12

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All

13

Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.

14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 12, 2017
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2