Dillingham v. Unknown
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Complaint and In Forma Pauperis Application. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re JERRY DILLINGHAM,
Case No. 17-cv-03698-YGR (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
COMPLAINT AND IN FORMA
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed with the Court a letter addressed to the Honorable Thelton E.
Henderson. The Clerk of the Court construed the letter from Plaintiff as a request to file a pro se
United States District Court
Northern District of California
prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2017, the Clerk sent Plaintiff a notice
directing him to file a complaint on the proper form along with an application to proceed in forma
pauperis (“IFP”) within twenty-eight days. He was warned that the failure to do so within the
twenty-eight-day deadline would result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his complaint.
Good cause appearing, the request is GRANTED. In addition, the Court on its own motion
GRANTS Plaintiff an extension of time to file an IFP application. No later than twenty-eight (28)
days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file his complaint on the proper form and a
completed IFP application form along with his trust account statement and certificate of funds. The
failure to do so on or by the twenty-eight-day deadline will result in the dismissal of this action
The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form and a blank prisoner IFP
application form along with a copy of this Order. This Order terminates Docket No. 4.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 8, 2017
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?