Doe v. City of South San Francisco et al
Filing
8
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying without prejudice 3 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Proceed Anonymously.(dmrlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
12
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY
v.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 3
Defendants.
The court has received Plaintiff’s administrative motion to proceed anonymously in this
13
case. [Docket No. 3.] The motion is denied without prejudice. The court will take up the issue of
14
Plaintiff’s proceeding anonymously after service of the summons and complaint is effected.
15
Plaintiff must determine how to serve the summons and complaint on Defendants so that
16
Defendants know Plaintiff’s identity for purposes of understanding the events at issue in her
17
complaint. Upon service, the parties shall meet and confer on this issue. Plaintiff may then file a
18
motion or stipulation to proceed anonymously, as appropriate.
S
26
27
28
R NIA
Judg
ER
H
25
RT
24
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
Ryu
United States e Donna M.
Magistrate Judge
NO
23
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
FO
22
Dated: August 2, 2017
LI
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
19
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 17-cv-04112-DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?