Rearden LLC et al v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al

Filing 288

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF NON-BATB CLAIMS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 287 Stipulation. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STEVE W. BERMAN (pro hac vice) steve@hbsslaw.com HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091) kelly.klaus@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants [Additional counsel on following page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REARDEN LLC, REARDEN MOVA LLC, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF NON-BATB CLAIMS vs. WALT DISNEY PICTURES, a California corporation, MARVEL STUDIOS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MVL PRODUCTIONS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, INFINITY PRODUCTIONS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ASSEMBLED PRODUCTIONS II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. 20 REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA LLC, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4:17-cv-04006-JST 4:17-cv-04191-JST Plaintiffs, 19 21 Case Nos. Plaintiffs, vs. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION and TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX HOME ENTERTAINMENT LLC, Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARK S. CARLSON (pro hac vice) markc@hbsslaw.com JERROD C. PATTERSON (pro hac vice) jerrodp@hbsslaw.com GARTH WOJTANOWICZ, CBA No. 246510 garthw@hbsslaw.com HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 BLANCA F. YOUNG (SBN 217533) blanca.young@mto.com STEPHANIE G. HERRERA (SBN 313887) stephanie.herrera@mto.com SHANNON AMINIRAD (SBN 324780) shannon.aminirad@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 RIO S. PIERCE, CBA No. 298297 riop@hbsslaw.com HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 JOHN W. SPIEGEL (SBN 78935) john.spiegel@mto.com JOHN L. SCHWAB (SBN 301386) john.schwab@mto.com ANNE K. CONLEY (SBN 307952) anne.conley@mto.com ROWLEY J. RICE (SBN 313737) rowley.rice@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 350 South Grand Avenue, 50th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-3426 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned cases (collectively, “Parties”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed suit against Walt Disney Pictures, Marvel Studios, LLC, 4 Infinity Productions LLC, Assembled Productions II LLC (the “WDP Defendants”) in the United 5 States District Court for the Northern District of California in the case captioned Rearden LLC et 6 al. v. Walt Disney Pictures et al., N.D. Cal. Case. No. 4:17-cv-04006-JST (the “WDP Lawsuit”); 7 WHEREAS, the WDP Lawsuit includes claims related to the motion pictures Beauty and 8 9 10 11 the Beast (2017), Guardians of the Galaxy, and Avengers: Age of Ultron; WHEREAS, the parties tried the claims related to Beauty and the Beast (2017) to a jury in December 2023 and are currently engaged in post-trial motion practice; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed suit against Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and 12 Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC (the “Fox Defendants”) in the United States 13 District Court for the Northern District of California in the case captioned Rearden LLC et al. v. 14 Walt Disney Pictures et al., N.D. Cal. Case. No. 4:17-cv-04191-JST (the “Fox Lawsuit”); 15 16 WHEREAS, the Fox Lawsuit includes claims related to the motion pictures Deadpool, Fantastic Four, and Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb; 17 WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement of all claims and controversies 18 concerning all motion pictures other than Beauty and the Beast (2017) that are the subject of the 19 WDP Lawsuit and the Fox Lawsuit (the “Non-BATB Claims”); 20 WHEREAS, the Parties agree the Non-BATB Claims should be dismissed with prejudice; 21 WHEREAS, the Parties agree the Court shall retain jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ copyright 22 claim (and Defendants’ defenses to the same) regarding Beauty and the Beast (2017); 23 THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows: 24 [1] Plaintiffs’ Non-BATB Claims are dismissed with prejudice; 25 [2] this Court shall not dismiss and shall retain jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ copyright 26 27 -2- 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF NON-BATB CLAIMS NOS. 17-CV-04006-JST-SK, 4:17-CV-04191-JST 1 claim (and Defendants’ defenses to the same) regarding Beauty and the Beast (2017); 2 3 [3] each Party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection with these actions; and 4 5 [4] following entry of the Order on this Stipulation, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close Case No. 4:17-cv-04191-JST. 6 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: May 30, 2024 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: 9 /s/ Kelly M. Klaus KELLY M. KLAUS Attorneys for Defendants 10 11 DATED: May 30, 2024 12 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP By: 13 /s/ Jerrod C. Patterson JERROD C. PATTERSON1 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 June 3, ___________________, 2024 19 The Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Signed electronically by Kelly M. Klaus with the concurrence of Jerrod C. Patterson, pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3). 27 -3- 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF NON-BATB CLAIMS NOS. 17-CV-04006-JST-SK, 4:17-CV-04191-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?