Housh v. Rackley
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING RESPONDENTS 9 APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARLOS C. HOUSH,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-04222-HSG (PR)
RONALD RACKLEY, Warden,
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF
Re: Dkt. No. 9
Good cause appearing, Respondent’s application for an extension of time to file an answer
to the petition is GRANTED. Respondent shall file his answer to the petition no later than
January 29, 2018. Within thirty (30) days of the date such answer is filed, Petitioner shall file
with the Court and serve on respondent a traverse.
Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set
forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If
Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an
opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-eight (28) days of the date the motion is
filed. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fourteen (14)
days of the date any opposition is filed.
This order terminates Docket No. 9.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?