Housh v. Rackley

Filing 71

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Terminating Docket No. 70 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CARLOS C. HOUSH,
Petitioner,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.

Case No. 17-cv-04222-HSG
ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 70

RONALD RACKLEY,
Respondent.

12
13

Petitioner has filed this pro se action for a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

14

28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has requested that the petition docketed at Dkt. No. 1 remain the

15

operative petition because the claim raised in Dkt. No. 66 has not yet been exhausted. Dkt. No.

16

70. The Court DENIES this request as moot. Dkt. No. 1 has always been the operative petition

17

and continues to be the operative petition. See, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 48, 67 (denying request to amend

18

petition piecemeal).

19

This order terminates Dkt. No. 70.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 5/26/2020
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge