Lilley v. Berryhill

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER extending time to file MSJ filed by Donald Ray Lilley, Nancy A. Berryhill. Motions due by 1/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/28/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SUZANNE ZALEV, SBN 252405 Homeless Action Center 3126 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, CA 94705 (510) 540-0878 x 326 tel. (510) 540-0403 fax szalev@homelessactioncenter.org Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 DONALD RAY LILLEY, Plaintiff, vs. ) CIVIL NO. 4:17-cv-04381-KAW ) ) ) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ) PROPOSED ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 15 19 undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the Plaintiff shall 20 21 have an extension of time, from December 14, 2017, until January 10, 2018, to submit his Motion for 22 Summary Judgment. All other deadlines shall be extended accordingly. Plaintiff requires additional 23 time due to significant competing workloads and school closures. This is Plaintiff’s first extension 24 request. Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time. 25 Respectfully submitted, 26 27 28 Suzanne Zalev, Attorney for Plaintiff 1 2 Dated: 11/27/2017 By: /s/ Suzanne M. Zalev SUZANNE ZALEV Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: 11/27/2017 By: /s/ Chantal R. Jenkins CHANTAL R. JENKINS (as authorized via email on _11/27/2017_____) Attorney for Defendant 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 10 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 11 12 13 11/28/17 Dated: _____________ __________________________________ HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?