Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Steindler, Thomas. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2017)

Download PDF
1   2   3   4   5   6   7 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRIC COURT N ES CT 8 IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIF F N N T FORNIA     9 OAK KLAND DIV VISION For the Nor t her n Distric t of Calif ornia U NITED S TA T ES D IST RICT C OU RT   10   PL LEXXIKON INC.,   N C Case No. 4:1 17-cv-04405 HSG 5     Plai intiff, 11 ORDER G GRANTING G ADMISSI ION OF AT TTORNEY PRO HAC VICE C   12 v.   13 NO OVARTIS PHARMACE P EUTICALS CO ORPORATI ION, 14 fendant. Def 15   16 Thoma P. Steind as dler, an activ member in good sta ve anding of th bar of the District of he 17 Co olumbia, wh hose business address an telephone number is M s nd McDermott W & Eme LLP, 500 Will ery 0 18 N. Capitol Str . reet, NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 756W -8000, havin applied in the aboveng n 19 en ntitled action for admissi to practi in the N n ion ice Northern Dist trict of Calif fornia on a p hac vice pro e 20 ba asis, represen nting Defend Novartis Pharmaceu dant uticals Corpo oration,           21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to th terms and O D e n he d 22 co onditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorne must indi y ey icate appeara ance pro hac c 23 ce. pon mmunication with co-cou unsel designe in the app ed plication will vic Service of papers up and com 24 onstitute noti to the party. All fu ice uture filings in this act s tion are subj ject to the r requirements s co 25 co ontained in General Orde No. 45, El G er lectronic Ca Filing. ase           26 27 DA ATED: Sept tember 14, 2017 2 By: Hon. Hayw wood S. Gilliam, Jr. United State District C es Court Judge 28   ORDER RE PR HAC VICE APPLICATION RO CASE NO. 4:17-CV-0440 05 HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?