Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Clouse, Katherine. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2017)

Download PDF
1   2   3   4   5   6   7 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRIC COURT N ES CT 8 IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIF F N N T FORNIA     9 OAK KLAND DIV VISION For the Nor t her n Distric t of Calif ornia U NITED S TA T ES D IST RICT C OU RT   10   PL LEXXIKON INC.,   N C Case No. 4:1 17-cv-04405 HSG 5     Plai intiff, 11 ORDER G GRANTING G ADMISSI ION OF AT TTORNEY PRO HAC VICE C   12 v.   13 NO OVARTIS PHARMACE P EUTICALS CO ORPORATI ION, 14 Def fendant. 15   16 Kather Nicole Clouse, an active membe in good st rine C er tanding of th bar of Ma he assachusetts s, 17 wh hose busines address an telephone number is M ss nd e McDermott Will & Eme LLP, 28 State Street ery t, 18 Bo oston, MA 02109, (617) 535-3841, having appli in the ab 0 ) h ied bove-entitled action for admission to d o 19 practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representin Defendant e D C n c ng 20 No ovartis Pharm maceuticals Corporation n,           21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to th terms and O D e n he d 22 co onditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorne must indi y ey icate appeara ance pro hac c 23 vic Service of papers up and com ce. pon mmunication with co-cou unsel designe in the app ed plication will 24 onstitute noti to the party. All fu ice uture filings in this act s tion are subj ject to the r requirements s co 25 ontained in General Orde No. 45, El G er lectronic Ca Filing. ase co           26 DA ATED: Sep ptember 14, 2017 2 By: Hon. Hayw wood S. Gilliam, Jr. United State District C es Court Judge 27 28   DM M_US 81416958-1.0 085448.0181 ORDER RE PR HAC VICE APPLICATION RO [CLOUSE] CASE NO. 4:17-CV E V-04405 HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?