Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT filed by PEDRO GARCIA, U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. Case referred to mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/11/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018)

Download PDF
Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  Pedro Garcia, CASE No C 17-4441 KAW Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS U.S. Dep't of HUD, et al. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:    Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)   s  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)   Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.  The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:    the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. )    other requested deadline:  120 days s Date: January 8, 2018 Date: January 8, 2018   /s/ Richard Sax Attorney for Plaintiff  /s/ David Pereda Attorney for Defendant   IT IS SO ORDERED x  IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 1/11/18 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE  Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 Print Form

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?