Vikram v. First Student Management, LLC

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options filed by Bhanu Vikram. Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/12/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Bhanu Vikram CASE No C 17-CV-04656 Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS First Student Management, LLC Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: after class certification motion Date: 12/7/17 Date: 12/7/17 /s/ Victoria B. Rivapalacio Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ David J. Dow Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED X IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Deadline to be set at next CMC based on class certification hearing date. Date: 12/12/17 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?