AutoOpt Networks, Inc. v. Karani et al
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 31 Stipulation OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS VIJAY KARANI AND MOBILE TERRACE, INC., WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2017)
1
2
3
LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND (SBN 88184)
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND
455 Market Street, Suite 1910
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel. 415.882.3288
Fax 41 5.882.3299
Email: ltownsend@owe.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
Autoopt Networks, Inc.
WALLACE C. DOOLITTLE (SBN 158116)
JAMES P. DOWNS (SBN 139489)
LAW OFFICES OF WALLACE C. DOOLITTLE
1260 B Street, Suite 250
Hayward, CA 94541
Tel. 510.888-0600
Fax: 510.888-0606
Email: doolittlew@doolittlelaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
AUTOOPT NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
19
20
21
22
23
24
VIJA Y KARAN!, an individual; MOBILE
TERRACE, INC., a California corporation;
GNANENTHIRAN JAY ANTHAN, an individual,
Case No. 4:17-cv-04714 . -HSG
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANTS VIJAY KARANI AND
MOBILE TERRACE, INC. WITH
PREJUDICE
[FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
Defendants.
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION
Plaintiff Autoopt Networks, Inc. and Defendants Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc.,
25
by their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
26
41(a)l)(A)(ii) that the civil action, as to Defendants Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc. only,
27
may be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees
28
Stipulation And [Proposed) Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
Case No.4: 17-cv-04714-HSG
and costs of suit.
2
Dated: November
_1,20 17
By: L/0 LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND
3
Is! Lawrence G. Townsend
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant Autoopt Networks, Inc.
s
6
Dated: November
By:
'20 17
L/0 WALLACE C. DOOLITTLE
Is! Wallace C. Dooliule
7
Attorneys for Defendants Vijay Karani and
Mobile Terrace, Inc.
8
9
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
10
11
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-l(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of
12
this docwnent has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of
13
their signatures on the docwnent.
14
Is! Lawrence G. Townsend
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradford Gregory
16
ORDER
17
Pursuant to stipulation ofthe parties, and Rule 41 (a)(l) and (A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY
18
19
20
21
ORDERED that the action herein be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to
Defendants Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc. only, each party to bear its own attorneys'
fees and costs.
22
23
Dated:
11/9/2017
------------------United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
S:\LGTĀ·TENA\AutooptNctworks\fed COjlyrisJ!t
Action\Stipu l at ion-OrdcrDismiss~lĀ·KIIfan i
and Mob ole Terrace.doc
2
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
Case No.4 : 17-cv-04714-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?