AutoOpt Networks, Inc. v. Karani et al

Filing 32

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 31 Stipulation OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS VIJAY KARANI AND MOBILE TERRACE, INC., WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2017)

1

2

3

LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND (SBN 88184)
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND
455 Market Street, Suite 1910
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

4
5

6
7
8

9

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
Autoopt Networks, Inc.
WALLACE C. DOOLITTLE (SBN 158116)
JAMES P. DOWNS (SBN 139489)
LAW OFFICES OF WALLACE C. DOOLITTLE
1260 B Street, Suite 250
Hayward, CA 94541
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc.

12
13

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

AUTOOPT NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.

19
20
21
22
23
24

VIJA Y KARAN!, an individual; MOBILE
TERRACE, INC., a California corporation;
GNANENTHIRAN JAY ANTHAN, an individual,

Case No. 4:17-cv-04714 . -HSG
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF

DEFENDANTS VIJAY KARANI AND
MOBILE TERRACE, INC. WITH
PREJUDICE
[FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Defendants.
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION
Plaintiff Autoopt Networks, Inc. and Defendants Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc.,

25

by their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26

41(a)l)(A)(ii) that the civil action, as to Defendants Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc. only,

27

may be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees

28
Stipulation And [Proposed) Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice

Case No.4: 17-cv-04714-HSG

and costs of suit.

2

Dated: November

_1,20 17

By: L/0 LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND

3

Is! Lawrence G. Townsend

4

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant Autoopt Networks, Inc.

s
6

Dated: November

By:

'20 17

L/0 WALLACE C. DOOLITTLE

Is! Wallace C. Dooliule

7

Attorneys for Defendants Vijay Karani and
Mobile Terrace, Inc.

8
9

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

10
11

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-l(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of

12

this docwnent has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of

13

their signatures on the docwnent.

14

Is! Lawrence G. Townsend

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradford Gregory

16
ORDER

17

Pursuant to stipulation ofthe parties, and Rule 41 (a)(l) and (A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY

18
19

20
21

ORDERED that the action herein be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to
Defendants Vijay Karani and Mobile Terrace, Inc. only, each party to bear its own attorneys'
fees and costs.

22
23

Dated:

11/9/2017
------------------United States District Judge

24

25
26
27
28

S:\LGT·TENA\AutooptNctworks\fed COjlyrisJ!t

Action\Stipu l at ion-OrdcrDismiss~l·KIIfan i

and Mob ole Terrace.doc

2

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice

Case No.4 : 17-cv-04714-HSG