Exeltis USA Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.

Filing 175

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 174 Stipulation ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE Re Docket Nos. 168 - 170 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Thomas R. Burke (SBN 141930)
[e-mail]
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111-6533
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: + 1 415 276-6599

Richard D. Raskin (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Jonathan R. Donnellan (pro hac vice)
THE HEARST CORPORATION
300 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Benjamin M. Mundel (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jacquelyn E. Fradette (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel J. Hay (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1501 K St NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Ravi V. Sitwala (pro hac vice)
THE HEARST CORPORATION
300 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
FIRST DATABANK, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
EXELTIS USA, INC.

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

OAKLAND DIVISION

20

EXELTIS USA, INC., a New Jersey Corporation,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,

Case No. 4:17-cv-04810-HSG-SK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE

v.
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri
Corporation,
Defendant.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-04810-HSG-SK

1

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate to the following:

2

On June 21, 2019, First Databank filed a motion for summary judgment and motions to

3

exclude the testimony of two expert witnesses offered by Exeltis. See ECF 168–70. By the Court’s

4

prior order, Exeltis’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment is due on July 26, 2019, see

5

ECF 155; and under Local Rule 7-3(a), Exeltis’s oppositions to the two motions to exclude are due

6

on July 5, 2019. All three motions are noticed for November 7, 2019.

7

To provide both parties sufficient time to brief these matters, the parties respectfully request

8

that the Court extend the deadline for Exeltis to respond to all three motions to August 16, 2019; and

9

additionally for the Court to extend First Databank’s deadline to file any replies in support of these

10

motions to September 20, 2019.

11

On May 1, 2018, the Court entered a stipulated discovery schedule. See ECF 82. Pursuant to

12

stipulations, the Court has entered amended discovery schedules on July 27, 2018; October 17, 2018;

13

January 22, 2019; and March 22, 2019. See ECF 86, 111, 122, 155.

14

DATED: June 27, 2019
Respectfully submitted,

15
16
17

By: /s/Ravi v. Sitwala_____________
Attorney for First Databank, Inc.

By: /s/ Benjamin M. Mundel
Attorney for Exeltis USA, Inc.

18
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

19
20

I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing

21

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule. In compliance with Local Rule 5-

22

1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatories have concurred in this filing.

23

DATED: June 28, 2019

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

24

By: /s/ Benjamin M. Mundel
Benjamin M. Mundel
Attorney for Exeltis USA, Inc.

25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-04810-HSG-SK

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, it is hereby

3

ORDERED as followed:

4

1.

The above stipulation is GRANTED.

5

2.

The Court ORDERS the following schedule:

6
7
8
9
10
11

Event

Proposed Date

Exeltis’s deadline to respond to First
Databank’s three pending motions
ECF 168–70

August 16, 2019

First Databank’s deadline to file
replies in support of these three
pending motions ECF 168–70

September 20, 2019

12
13
14
15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: June 28, 2019

_________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-04810-HSG-SK