Exeltis USA Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
Filing
40
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document Docket # [35-5]. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)
rsandrock@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: +1 415 772 1200
Facsimile: +1 415 772 7400
5
6
7
8
Richard D. Raskin (pro hac vice)
rraskin@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: +1 312 853 7000
Facsimile: +1 312 853 7036
9
10
11
12
13
Benjamin M. Mundel (pro hac vice)
bmundel@sidley.com
Daniel J. Hay (pro hac vice)
dhay@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1501 K St NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: +1 202 736 8157
Facsimile: +1 202 736 8711
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EXELTIS USA, INC.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
OAKLAND DIVISION
19
EXELTIS USA, INC., a New Jersey Corporation,
Case No. 4:17-cv-04810-HSG
20
Plaintiff,
21
vs.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY
FILED DOCUMENT
22
23
24
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri
Corporation,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04810-HSG
1
2
The Court having considered Plaintiff Exeltis USA, Inc.’s Unopposed Administrative Motion
to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document, and good cause appearing therefor,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Exeltis USA, Inc.’s Unopposed Administrative
4
Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document is GRANTED. The document previously filed as
5
ECF No. 35-5 will be removed, and will be replaced with the document subsequently filed as ECF
6
No. 38.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED
9
10
11
November ____, 2017
13
________________________________
The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
U.S. District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04810-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?