Brown et al v. Target Corporation

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 32 Second Stipulation Re Revisions to Pretrial Scheduling Order. Close of Expert Discovery due by 12/14/2018 and Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/18/2018 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 David L. Winnett – SBN 219063 THE VEEN FIRM, P.C. 711 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220 San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel: (415) 673-4800 Fax: (415) 771-5845 Email: d.winnett@VeenFirm.com Attorney for Plaintiffs LESLIE and SHANE BROWN Renée Welze Livingston – SBN 124280 LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 1600 South Main Street, Suite 280 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 952-9880 Fax: (925) 952-9881 Email: rlivingston@livingstonlawyers.com Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 LESLIE BROWN and SHANE BROWN, 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, vs. TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET STORE #1438 and DOES 1 to 40, 19 Defendants. 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING Complaint Filed: 06/16/17 [Napa County Superior Court Case No. 17CV000666] The parties mediated the case with Matthew S. Conant, Esq., on October 31, 2018. The 22 mediation was unsuccessful. In good faith anticipation of the mediation, the parties postponed the 23 depositions of some of plaintiffs’ non-retained expert witnesses, in order to hopefully avoid 24 incurring the cost of taking them in the event of a successful mediation. This - along with the 25 approaching holidays, plaintiffs’ counsel’s opportunity to attend a conference the week after 26 Thanksgiving, and defense counsel’s opportunity to attend a conference the following week - has 27 tightened the calendar somewhat. The parties have met and conferred for the purpose of revising 28 622236.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Brown v. Target Corporation, Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING -1- 1 the existing expert discovery deadline to facilitate a meaningful mediation while still maintaining 2 the existing trial date. These dates have been modified from those originally contemplated by the 3 parties: 4 1. CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY: December 14, 2018 2. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: December 18, 2018 at 3:00 p.m. 3. JURY TRIAL (7 days estimated): January 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (5 days) 5 6 7 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 12 Dated: November 6, 2018 THE VEEN FIRM 13 /s/ David L. Winnett By 14 David L. Winnett Attorneys for Plaintiffs LESLIE AND SHANE BROWN 15 16 17 18 Dated: November 6, 2018 LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM 19 /s/ Renee Welze Livingston 20 By Renée Welze Livingston Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 28 622236.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Brown v. Target Corporation, Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING -2- 1 SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 DATED: 11/17/2018 _____________________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 622236.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Brown v. Target Corporation, Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?