Brown et al v. Target Corporation
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 32 Second Stipulation Re Revisions to Pretrial Scheduling Order. Close of Expert Discovery due by 12/14/2018 and Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/18/2018 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
David L. Winnett – SBN 219063
THE VEEN FIRM, P.C.
711 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220
San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: (415) 673-4800
Fax: (415) 771-5845
Email: d.winnett@VeenFirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
LESLIE and SHANE BROWN
Renée Welze Livingston – SBN 124280
LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation
1600 South Main Street, Suite 280
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 952-9880
Fax: (925) 952-9881
Email: rlivingston@livingstonlawyers.com
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
LESLIE BROWN and SHANE BROWN,
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
vs.
TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET
STORE #1438 and DOES 1 to 40,
19
Defendants.
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG
SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE
SCHEDULING
Complaint Filed: 06/16/17
[Napa County Superior Court
Case No. 17CV000666]
The parties mediated the case with Matthew S. Conant, Esq., on October 31, 2018. The
22
mediation was unsuccessful. In good faith anticipation of the mediation, the parties postponed the
23
depositions of some of plaintiffs’ non-retained expert witnesses, in order to hopefully avoid
24
incurring the cost of taking them in the event of a successful mediation. This - along with the
25
approaching holidays, plaintiffs’ counsel’s opportunity to attend a conference the week after
26
Thanksgiving, and defense counsel’s opportunity to attend a conference the following week - has
27
tightened the calendar somewhat. The parties have met and conferred for the purpose of revising
28
622236.1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Brown v. Target Corporation, Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING
-1-
1
the existing expert discovery deadline to facilitate a meaningful mediation while still maintaining
2
the existing trial date. These dates have been modified from those originally contemplated by the
3
parties:
4
1. CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY:
December 14, 2018
2. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
December 18, 2018 at 3:00 p.m.
3. JURY TRIAL (7 days estimated):
January 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (5 days)
5
6
7
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted,
11
12
Dated: November 6, 2018
THE VEEN FIRM
13
/s/ David L. Winnett
By
14
David L. Winnett
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LESLIE AND SHANE BROWN
15
16
17
18
Dated: November 6, 2018
LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM
19
/s/ Renee Welze Livingston
20
By
Renée Welze Livingston
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
28
622236.1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Brown v. Target Corporation, Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING
-2-
1
SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
DATED:
11/17/2018
_____________________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
622236.1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Brown v. Target Corporation, Case No. 4:17-cv-04818-HSG
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?