Falk et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Filing
34
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Stipulation To Extend Page Limit of NNA's Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386)
michael.stortz@dbr.com
MARSHALL L. BAKER (SBN 300987)
marshall.baker@dbr.com
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2235
Telephone: 415-591-7500
Facsimile:
415-591-7510
E. PAUL CAULEY (pro hac vice)
paul.cauley@dbr.com
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1717 Main Street, Suite 5400
Dallas, Texas 75201-7367
Telephone: 469-623Facsimile:
469-623Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
18
MICHELLE FALK, INDHU JAYAVELU,
PATRICIA L. CRUZ, DANIELLE TROTTER,
AND AMANDA MACRI, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
19
Case No. 4:17-cv-04871-HSG
Plaintiffs,
17
20
21
22
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
PAGE LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO
DISMISS; ORDER
v.
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE
LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG
1
Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“NNA”) and Plaintiffs Michelle Falk, Indhu
2
Jayavelu, Patricia L. Cruz, Danielle Trotter, Amanda Macri, and Cynthia Garrison (“Plaintiffs”),
3
by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to agree as
4
follows:
5
6
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulated order (Dkt. No. 18), Plaintiffs filed their First
Amended Complaint (“FAC”), on September 27, 2017. See Dkt. No. 19.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ FAC asserts individual claims for Plaintiffs, and claims on behalf
8
of a nationwide class, or in the alternative, six subclasses of residents from Plaintiffs’ respective
9
home states of California, Ohio, New York, Colorado, Massachusetts and Illinois (“Plaintiffs’
10
11
States”).
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ FAC asserts 15 claims for relief, including claims for breach of
12
warranty under state and federal law, for alleged violation of eight (8) separate consumer
13
protection statutes in Plaintiffs’ States, and for broad equitable, injunctive, and declaratory relief.
14
See FAC, Dkt. No. 19.
15
16
17
WHEREAS, NNA’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ FAC is due October 26, 2017. See
Dkt. No. 18.
WHEREAS, given the number and complexity of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the
18
FAC, the Parties have agreed to provide NNA a five (5) page increase in the page limits set forth
19
in Civil L.R. 7-2 for purposes of its Motion to Dismiss.
20
THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
21
NNA’s memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed thirty
22
(30) pages in length, exclusive of the caption page, notice of motion, table of
23
contents, and table of authorities.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE
LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS
-2-
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG
1
Dated: October 24, 2017
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz
Michael J. Stortz
Marshall L. Baker
4
5
Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
6
7
Dated: October 24, 2017
WHITFIELD BRYSON & MASON LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Gary Mason
Gary Mason (pro hac vice)
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)
13
14
15
16
17
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Michael J. Stortz, hereby attest that I have obtained
concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24 day of October, 2017 in San Francisco, California.
18
By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz
Michael J. Stortz
19
20
ORDER
21
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
Date: October 24, 2017
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE
LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS
-3-
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?