Falk et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Stipulation To Extend Page Limit of NNA's Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386) michael.stortz@dbr.com MARSHALL L. BAKER (SBN 300987) marshall.baker@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2235 Telephone: 415-591-7500 Facsimile: 415-591-7510 E. PAUL CAULEY (pro hac vice) paul.cauley@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 1717 Main Street, Suite 5400 Dallas, Texas 75201-7367 Telephone: 469-623Facsimile: 469-623Attorneys for Defendant NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 18 MICHELLE FALK, INDHU JAYAVELU, PATRICIA L. CRUZ, DANIELLE TROTTER, AND AMANDA MACRI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Case No. 4:17-cv-04871-HSG Plaintiffs, 17 20 21 22 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG 1 Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“NNA”) and Plaintiffs Michelle Falk, Indhu 2 Jayavelu, Patricia L. Cruz, Danielle Trotter, Amanda Macri, and Cynthia Garrison (“Plaintiffs”), 3 by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to agree as 4 follows: 5 6 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulated order (Dkt. No. 18), Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), on September 27, 2017. See Dkt. No. 19. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ FAC asserts individual claims for Plaintiffs, and claims on behalf 8 of a nationwide class, or in the alternative, six subclasses of residents from Plaintiffs’ respective 9 home states of California, Ohio, New York, Colorado, Massachusetts and Illinois (“Plaintiffs’ 10 11 States”). WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ FAC asserts 15 claims for relief, including claims for breach of 12 warranty under state and federal law, for alleged violation of eight (8) separate consumer 13 protection statutes in Plaintiffs’ States, and for broad equitable, injunctive, and declaratory relief. 14 See FAC, Dkt. No. 19. 15 16 17 WHEREAS, NNA’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ FAC is due October 26, 2017. See Dkt. No. 18. WHEREAS, given the number and complexity of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the 18 FAC, the Parties have agreed to provide NNA a five (5) page increase in the page limits set forth 19 in Civil L.R. 7-2 for purposes of its Motion to Dismiss. 20 THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 21  NNA’s memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed thirty 22 (30) pages in length, exclusive of the caption page, notice of motion, table of 23 contents, and table of authorities. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS -2- CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG 1 Dated: October 24, 2017 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz Michael J. Stortz Marshall L. Baker 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 6 7 Dated: October 24, 2017 WHITFIELD BRYSON & MASON LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Gary Mason Gary Mason (pro hac vice) 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) 13 14 15 16 17 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Michael J. Stortz, hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24 day of October, 2017 in San Francisco, California. 18 By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz Michael J. Stortz 19 20 ORDER 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 Date: October 24, 2017 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS -3- CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?