Falk et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filing 53

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 52 Stipulation to Extend Page Limit of NNA's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2235
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-591-7510
MARSHALL L. BAKER (SBN 300987)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, California 90067-1517
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
310-229-1285
E. PAUL CAULEY (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1717 Main Street, Suite 5400
Dallas, Texas 75201-7367
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
469-327-0860
Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

OAKLAND DIVISION

18

21

MICHELLE FALK, INDHU JAYAVELU,
PATRICIA L. CRUZ, DANIELLE TROTTER,
CYNTHIA GARRISON, AND AMANDA
MACRI, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,

22

Plaintiffs,

19
20

23
24
25

v.
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Case No. 4:17-cv-04871-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
PAGE LIMIT OF NNA’S REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:

January 11, 2018
2:00 p.m.
2 - 4th Floor
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Defendant.

26
27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE
LIMIT OF NNA’S REPLY ISO MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG

1

Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“NNA”) and Plaintiffs Michelle Falk, Indhu

2

Jayavelu, Patricia L. Cruz, Danielle Trotter, Amanda Macri, and Cynthia Garrison (“Plaintiffs”),

3

by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to agree as

4

follows:

5
6

WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulated order (Dkt. No. 18), Plaintiffs filed their First
Amended Complaint (“FAC”), on September 27, 2017. See Dkt. No. 19.

7

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ FAC asserts individual claims for Plaintiffs, and claims on behalf

8

of a nationwide class, or in the alternative, six subclasses of residents from Plaintiffs’ respective

9

home states of California, Ohio, New York, Colorado, Massachusetts and Illinois (“Plaintiffs’

10

States”).

11

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ FAC asserts 15 claims for relief, including claims for breach of

12

warranty under state and federal law, for alleged violation of eight (8) separate consumer

13

protection statutes in Plaintiffs’ States, and for broad equitable, injunctive, and declaratory relief.

14

See FAC, Dkt. No. 19.

15
16

WHEREAS, NNA’s filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ FAC on October 26, 2017
(“Motion”). See Dkt. No. 35.

17
18

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Stipulation Order (see Dkt. Nos. 18, 48), Plaintiffs filed their
thirty-page Opposition to NNA’s Motion on December 1, 2017. See Dkt. No. 49.

19
20

WHEREAS, NNA’s Reply in support of its Motion is due December 21, 2017. See Dkt.
No. 18.

21

WHEREAS, given the number and complexity of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the

22

FAC, and in order to provide NNA an opportunity to adequately address Plaintiffs’ Opposition,

23

the Parties have agreed to provide NNA a five (5) page increase in the page limits set forth in

24

Civil L.R. 7-3(c) for purposes of its Reply in Support of its Motion.

25

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

26



NNA’s Reply memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed

27

twenty (20) pages in length, exclusive of the caption page, table of contents, and table

28

of authorities.

DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE
LIMIT OF NNA’S REPLY ISO MOTION TO DISMISS

-1-

CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG

1

Dated: December 18, 2017

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz
Michael J. Stortz
Marshall L. Baker
E. Paul Cauley, Jr. (pro hac vice)

4
5

Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

6
7
8

Dated: December 18, 2017

WHITFIELD BRYSON & MASON LLP

9
10

By: /s/ Gary Mason
Gary Mason (pro hac vice)

11

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

12
13

Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)

14
15

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Michael J. Stortz, hereby attest that I have obtained
concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document.

16

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

17

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 18th day of December, 2017 in San Francisco,

18

California.

19
By: /s./ Michael J. Stortz
Michael J. Stortz

20
21

[PROPOSED] ORDER

22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Date:

12/19/2017
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27

90736974.1

28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE
LIMIT OF NNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS

-2-

CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04871-HSG