Hawthorne v. Kernan et al
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 99 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARLOS A. HAWTHORNE,
A YANEZ, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-04960-HSG
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
Re: Dkt. No. 99
The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s request for an
extension of time to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No.
99. By December 19, 2022, Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve upon Defendants his
opposition to Defendants’ dispositive motion. Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of
their dispositive motion no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The motion
shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the
motion. No further extensions of time will be granted.
This order terminates Dkt. No. 99.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?