Hawthorne v. Kernan et al

Filing 101

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 99 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CARLOS A. HAWTHORNE,
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

10

A YANEZ, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 17-cv-04960-HSG
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION
Re: Dkt. No. 99

12
13

The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s request for an

14

extension of time to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No.

15

99. By December 19, 2022, Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve upon Defendants his

16

opposition to Defendants’ dispositive motion. Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of

17

their dispositive motion no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The motion

18

shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the

19

motion. No further extensions of time will be granted.

20

This order terminates Dkt. No. 99.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

11/18/2022
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge