Hawthorne v. Kernan et al
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 64 REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE.(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CARLOS A. HAWTHORNE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
10
A YANEZ, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 17-cv-04960-HSG
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. No. 64
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
Good cause being shown, Defendants’ request to modify the briefing schedule is
GRANTED. Dkt. No. 64.
By December 10, 2021, Defendants shall file a dispositive motion raising the exhaustion
16
defense. Within 28 days of the date this motion is filed, Plaintiff shall file with the Court and
17
serve upon Defendants his opposition. Within 14 days after the opposition is docketed,
18
Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of their exhaustion-based dispositive motion. Forty-
19
five (45) days after the Court issues its ruling on the exhaustion-based dispositive motion,
20
Defendants shall file their merits-based motion. Within 28 days of the date the merits-based
21
dispositive motion is filed, Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve upon Defendants his
22
opposition to this motion. Within 14 days after the opposition is docketed, Defendants shall file a
23
reply brief in support of their merits-based dispositive motion.
24
This order terminates Dkt. No. 64.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: October 29, 2021
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?