Hawthorne v. Kernan et al

Filing 97

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 96 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 95 DISPOSITIVE MOTION. Responses due by 11/17/2022. Replies due by 12/1/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARLOS A. HAWTHORNE, Plaintiff, 8 9 v. 10 A YANEZ, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-cv-04960-HSG ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 96 Defendants. 12 13 Good cause being shown, Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition 14 to Defendants’ dispositive motion is granted. Dkt. No. 96. By November 17, 2022, Plaintiff shall 15 file with the Court and serve upon Defendants his opposition to Defendants’ dispositive motion. 16 Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of their dispositive motion no later than 14 days after 17 the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply 18 brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion. 19 This order terminates Dkt. No. 96. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 9/30/2022 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?