Renowitzky v. The People of the United States

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/2/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on December 20, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2017)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

CARL RENOWITZKY,

Case No. 17-cv-05365-DMR

Plaintiff,
7
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

8
9

THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.

10
On September 15, 2017, Pro se Plaintiff Carl Renowitzky filed suit in this Court. [Docket

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

No. 1.] The court set the Initial Case Management as December 20, 2017. See Order Setting

13

Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines [Docket No. 2].
Since the filing of the lawsuit, Mr. Renowitzky has not responded to communications from

14
15

this court. Several Clerks’ Notices have been returned as undeliverable from the mailing address

16

Mr. Renowitzky provided to the court. See, e.g., Docket Nos. 5, 6, 9. Because Mr. Renowitzky

17

did not file a change of address, the court tried to reach him via an e-mail address he listed for a

18

previously dismissed case. On December 13, 2017, the Clerk e-mailed Mr. Renowitzky, advising

19

him that the court had been trying to reach him. The Clerk also attached the prior Clerks’ Notices

20

and the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, informed Mr.

21

Renowitzky of the upcoming Case Management Conference on December 20, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.,

22

and notified him that he needed to appear at the Case Management Conference in person. The

23

Clerk’s December 13, 2017 e-mail was not returned as undeliverable.
On December 20, 2017, the court held the Initial Case Management Conference. Mr.

24
25

Renowitzky did not make an appearance. [Docket No. 10].

26

//

27

//

28

//

1

Accordingly, the court ORDERS Mr. Renowitzky to respond by January 2, 2018 and

2

explain why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond by

3

January 2, 2018 may result in dismissal of this action.

aM

H

ER

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

FO

RT

10

R NIA

I
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate u
. Ry Judge

9

United States District Court
Northern District of California

onn
Judge D

ERED

LI

8

ORD
T IS SO

A

7

Dated: December 20, 2017

UNIT
ED

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

4

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C