Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
69
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 64 Stipulation Staying Litigation Pending Inter Partes Reviews. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
M. ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125)
eday@feinday.com
DAVID ALBERTI (SBN 220265)
dalberti@feinday.com
MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290)
mbelloli@feinday.com
FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI LIM &
BELLOLI LLP
1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: 650.618.4360
Fax: 650.618.4368
NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
Hao Ni (pro hac vice)
hni@nilawfirm.com
8140 Walnut Hill Lane Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75231
Telephone: (972) 331-4600
Facsimile: (972) 314-0900
Heidi Lyn Keefe (SBN 178960)
hkeefe@cooley.com
Mark R. Weinstein (SBN 193043)
mweinstein@cooley.com
Lowell D. Mead (SBN 223989)
lmead@cooley.com
Daniel J. Knauss (SBN 267414)
dknauss@cooley.com
Azadeh Morrison (SBN 311046)
amorrison@cooley.com
COOLEY LLP
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Facsimile: (650) 849-7400
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
FACEBOOK, INC.
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC.
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG
STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED
ORDER] STAYING LITIGATION
PENDING INTER PARTES
REVIEWS
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG
STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION
PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS
1
WHEREAS Plaintiff Hypermedia Navigation LLC (“Hypermedia”) filed a Complaint
2
against Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,383,323,
3
7,383,324, 7,424,523, 7,478,144, 7,769,830, 8,250,173, and 9,083,672 (collectively the “Original
4
Complaint Patents-in-Suit”) (Dkt. No. 1);
5
WHEREAS Hypermedia filed an Amended Complaint against Facebook alleging
6
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,772,814, and 9,864,575 (collectively the “Amended Complaint
7
Patents-in-Suit”) (Dkt. No. 59);
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS Facebook filed Petitions for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of each of the
Original Complaint Patents-in-Suit;
WHEREAS Facebook will file Petitions for IPR of both of the Amended Complaint Patentsin-Suit from within 30 days of entry of this Stipulation as an Order by the Court;
12
WHEREAS pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 313-314 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(b), the Patent Trial
13
and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) must determine whether to institute an IPR proceeding within six
14
months of the accorded filing date of a Petition;
15
16
WHEREAS Hypermedia and Facebook have met and conferred and discussed ways to
conserve judicial and party resources and promote judicial economy;
17
WHEREAS this case is still in its early stages, very limited substantive written discovery
18
has taken place, no depositions have been noticed or taken, no expert discovery has occurred, claim
19
construction briefing is in early stages, and no Markman hearing has taken place or Markman order
20
issued; and
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS the parties agree to stay all deadlines pending issuance of institution decisions
by the PTAB on Facebook’s Petitions for IPR;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between
the undersigned counsel for the parties and subject to the approval of the Court, that:
1.
All deadlines and hearings in this action are STAYED until further order of the Court
26
pending issuance of the institution decisions under 35 U.S.C. § 314 in Facebook’s Petitions for IPR
27
of all Patents-in-Suit;
28
2.
Within 30 days of issuance of institution decisions in Facebook’s Petitions for IPR of
Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG
1
STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION
PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS
1
all Patents-in-Suit, Facebook and Hypermedia will meet and confer to discuss next steps in light of
2
the PTAB institution decisions and submit a Case Management update to the Court; and
3
4
3.
Facebook agrees to file Petitions for IPR of the Amended Complaint Patents-in-Suit
within 30 days of entry of this Stipulation as an Order by the Court.
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
7
8
Dated: October 15, 2018
NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
9
/s/ Hao Ni
Hao Ni
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC
10
11
12
Dated: October 15, 2018
COOLEY LLP
13
14
/s/ Heidi L. Keefe
Heidi L. Keefe
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
15
16
17
18
19
FILER'S ATTESTATION
20
21
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5.1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from each of the other signatories above.
22
23
Dated: October 15, 2018
/s/ Heidi L. Keefe
Heidi L. Keefe
24
25
26
///
///
27
28
///
Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG
2
STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION
PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: October 24, 2018
___
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG
3
STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION
PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?