Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 69

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 64 Stipulation Staying Litigation Pending Inter Partes Reviews. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M. ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125) eday@feinday.com DAVID ALBERTI (SBN 220265) dalberti@feinday.com MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290) mbelloli@feinday.com FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI LIM & BELLOLI LLP 1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: 650.618.4360 Fax: 650.618.4368 NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC Hao Ni (pro hac vice) hni@nilawfirm.com 8140 Walnut Hill Lane Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75231 Telephone: (972) 331-4600 Facsimile: (972) 314-0900 Heidi Lyn Keefe (SBN 178960) hkeefe@cooley.com Mark R. Weinstein (SBN 193043) mweinstein@cooley.com Lowell D. Mead (SBN 223989) lmead@cooley.com Daniel J. Knauss (SBN 267414) dknauss@cooley.com Azadeh Morrison (SBN 311046) amorrison@cooley.com COOLEY LLP 3175 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC. Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] STAYING LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS 1 WHEREAS Plaintiff Hypermedia Navigation LLC (“Hypermedia”) filed a Complaint 2 against Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,383,323, 3 7,383,324, 7,424,523, 7,478,144, 7,769,830, 8,250,173, and 9,083,672 (collectively the “Original 4 Complaint Patents-in-Suit”) (Dkt. No. 1); 5 WHEREAS Hypermedia filed an Amended Complaint against Facebook alleging 6 infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,772,814, and 9,864,575 (collectively the “Amended Complaint 7 Patents-in-Suit”) (Dkt. No. 59); 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS Facebook filed Petitions for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of each of the Original Complaint Patents-in-Suit; WHEREAS Facebook will file Petitions for IPR of both of the Amended Complaint Patentsin-Suit from within 30 days of entry of this Stipulation as an Order by the Court; 12 WHEREAS pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 313-314 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(b), the Patent Trial 13 and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) must determine whether to institute an IPR proceeding within six 14 months of the accorded filing date of a Petition; 15 16 WHEREAS Hypermedia and Facebook have met and conferred and discussed ways to conserve judicial and party resources and promote judicial economy; 17 WHEREAS this case is still in its early stages, very limited substantive written discovery 18 has taken place, no depositions have been noticed or taken, no expert discovery has occurred, claim 19 construction briefing is in early stages, and no Markman hearing has taken place or Markman order 20 issued; and 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS the parties agree to stay all deadlines pending issuance of institution decisions by the PTAB on Facebook’s Petitions for IPR; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties and subject to the approval of the Court, that: 1. All deadlines and hearings in this action are STAYED until further order of the Court 26 pending issuance of the institution decisions under 35 U.S.C. § 314 in Facebook’s Petitions for IPR 27 of all Patents-in-Suit; 28 2. Within 30 days of issuance of institution decisions in Facebook’s Petitions for IPR of Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG 1 STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS 1 all Patents-in-Suit, Facebook and Hypermedia will meet and confer to discuss next steps in light of 2 the PTAB institution decisions and submit a Case Management update to the Court; and 3 4 3. Facebook agrees to file Petitions for IPR of the Amended Complaint Patents-in-Suit within 30 days of entry of this Stipulation as an Order by the Court. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record. 7 8 Dated: October 15, 2018 NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC 9 /s/ Hao Ni Hao Ni Attorneys for Plaintiff HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC 10 11 12 Dated: October 15, 2018 COOLEY LLP 13 14 /s/ Heidi L. Keefe Heidi L. Keefe Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 15 16 17 18 19 FILER'S ATTESTATION 20 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5.1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories above. 22 23 Dated: October 15, 2018 /s/ Heidi L. Keefe Heidi L. Keefe 24 25 26 /// /// 27 28 /// Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG 2 STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: October 24, 2018 ___ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:17-cv-05383-HSG 3 STIPULATION/PROP ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?