Vaupen v. Branston

Filing 26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/22/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on December 20, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KIMBERLY VAUPEN,

Case No. 17-cv-05463-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9
10

PHIL BRANSTON,
Defendant.

12

Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on December 1, 2017. [Docket No. 9]. Pursuant to

13

Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), any brief in opposition to Defendant’s motion was due on December 15,

14

2017, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiff Kimberly Vaupen is ordered to respond

15

by December 22, 2017 at 5 p.m., and show cause for her failure to respond to the motion in

16

accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternatively to file a statement of non-opposition to

17

the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute

18

permission to file a late opposition. If Plaintiff Kimberly Vaupen does not respond by December

19

22, 2017 at 5 p.m., Defendant’s motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for failure to

20

prosecute.

28

ER

R NIA

M. Ryu

FO

onna
Judge D

H

27

RT

26

Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

NO

25

D
RDERE
S SO O
______________________________________
IT I

LI

24

Dated: December 20, 2017

A

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

22

S

21

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C