Irving Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund v. Uber Technologies et al

Filing 131

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 130 Stipulation Extending time. Amended Pleadings due by 10/17/2018, Motions due by 11/16/2018, Replies due by 1/8/2019 and Responses due by 12/17/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IRVING FIREMEN’S RELIEF & 10 RETIREMENT FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1468082_1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:17-cv-05558-HSG CLASS ACTION STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME AND ORDER 1 Plaintiff Irving Firemen’s Relief & Retirement Fund (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Uber 2 Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, on December 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint (the 4 “FAC”); 5 WHEREAS, by order dated August 31, 2018 (ECF No. 127), the Court dismissed the FAC 6 and provided Plaintiff 28 days to file a second amended complaint (the “SAC”), or until September 7 28, 2018; 8 WHEREAS, due to the current time period to amend and counsel’s other conflicting 9 deadlines, Plaintiff requires additional time to draft its SAC, and Defendants require additional time to respond to the SAC; 10 WHEREAS, the parties have negotiated a schedule for Plaintiff to file its SAC, for any 11 responsive pleading to the SAC and a briefing schedule in the event that Defendants move to dismiss 12 the SAC; 13 WHEREAS, other than the deadline for Plaintiff’s SAC, the parties’ negotiated schedule will 14 not affect or alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order or otherwise affect 15 the schedule of the case, as discovery has been stayed (ECF No. 127) and there are no other events or deadlines currently scheduled; 16 WHEREAS, on three prior occasions, the parties have stipulated to extending Defendants’ 17 time to respond to the Complaint and FAC and to extended briefing schedules on Defendants’ 18 motions to dismiss the Complaint and FAC (ECF Nos. 11, 18, 48); 19 WHEREAS, the Court previously granted each of these stipulations (ECF Nos. 12, 19, 49); 20 WHEREAS, other than these three prior occasions, there have been no other time 21 modifications in the case. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, through their 22 undersigned counsel and subject to this Court’s approval: 23 1. Plaintiff’s deadline to file its SAC is extended through and including October 17, 24 2018. 25 2. Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s SAC is extended 26 through and including November 16, 2018. 27 28 1468082_1 3. If Defendants move to dismiss, Plaintiff may respond by December 17, 2018, and Defendants may reply by January 8, 2019. STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME AND ORDER - 4:17-cv-05558-HSG -1- 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 DATED: September 5, 2018 3 4 5 6 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP DARREN J. ROBBINS JASON A. FORGE LUKE O. BROOKS LUCAS F. OLTS DARRYL J. ALVARADO JEFFREY J. STEIN ERIKA OLIVER 7 s/ LUKE O. BROOKS LUKE O. BROOKS 8 9 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101-8498 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) 10 11 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP DENNIS J. HERMAN Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: September 5, 2018 18 IRELL & MANELLA LLP NATHANIEL LIPANOVICH 19 s/ NATHANIEL LIPANOVICH NATHANIEL LIPANOVICH 20 21 23 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 Newport Beach, CA 92660-6324 Telephone: 949/760-0991 949/760-5200 (fax) 24 Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. 25 DATED: September 5, 2018 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP WALTER F. BROWN, JR. JAMES N. KRAMER M. TODD SCOTT COLLEEN E. POPKEN 22 26 27 28 1468082_1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME AND ORDER - 4:17-cv-05558-HSG -2- 1 2 s/ JAMES N. KRAMER JAMES N. KRAMER 3 6 The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: 415/773-5700 415/773-5759 (fax) 7 Attorneys for Defendant Travis Kalanick 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(I)(3) I, LUKE O. BROOKS, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation Extending Time and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 51(i)(3), I hereby attest that NATHANIEL LIPANOVICH and JAMES N. KRAMER have concurred in this filing. 13 s/ LUKE O. BROOKS LUKE O. BROOKS 14 15 * 16 17 18 19 20 * * ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 6, 2018 ____________________________________ THE HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1468082_1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME AND ORDER - 4:17-cv-05558-HSG -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?